Two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making for wind-photovoltaic-hydropower scheduling

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Weifeng [1 ]
Guo, Xuning [1 ]
Xing, Xigang [1 ]
Jiang, Chenhui [1 ]
Li, Jieyu [2 ]
Lu, Qingwen [3 ]
Li, Yunling [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Planning & D, Beijing 100120, Peoples R China
[2] YRCC, Yellow River Inst Hydraul Res, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Municipal Water Bur, Shanghai 201699, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Stochastic multi-criteria decision making; SMAA; Uncertainty; Wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems; OPERATION; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL; MCDM;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.068
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems is a complex multi-objective collaborative problem which requires multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to assist in formulating the most-preferred scheduling scheme. There are uncertainties existing in criteria weights (CWs) due to the limitations of the knowledge level of decision makers and the subjectivity of preferences. This paper proposes a two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making model considering the uncertainties in the decision making environment and the progression of the decision making process. For the prophase decision making (the first stage), the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) theory and the MCDM model VIKOR are combined to construct a SMAA-VIKOR model for inverse weight space analysis on the situation that the initial CW information is completely unknown. In the second stage of decision making, the decision makers are allowed to express their fuzzy preferences based on the information provided in the first stage by coupling the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP) into the SMAA-VIKOR model to obtain the final scheme. The wind-photovoltaic-hydropower system in Yalong River Basin is selected as the case study. Results show that among the 12 alternative schemes, scheme A2 is ranked first with the probability of 0.69 in the first stage while the probability of taking the first ranking in the second stage is increased to 1. More explicit ranking results are obtained based on the results of the first stage, which effectively enhances the confidence of decision makers and improves decision making efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:3732 / 3742
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sizing of a standalone photovoltaic water pumping system using hybrid multi-criteria decision making methods
    Muhsen, Dhiaa Halboot
    Khatib, Tamer
    Abdulabbas, Tawfeeq Enad
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2018, 159 : 1003 - 1015
  • [32] A Two-Stage Decision-Making Method Based on WebGIS for Bulk Material Transportation of Hydropower Construction
    Wang, Hao
    Liu, Quan
    Zhang, Hongyang
    Jin, Yinlong
    Yu, Wenzhen
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (05)
  • [33] Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach for the evaluation of sustainable photovoltaic farms locations
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Gamal, Abduallah
    ELkomy, Osama M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 328
  • [34] Two-stage linear decision rules for multi-stage stochastic programming
    Bodur, Merve
    Luedtke, James R.
    MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2022, 191 (01) : 347 - 380
  • [35] An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making
    Mou, Qiong
    Xu, Zeshui
    Liao, Huchang
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 374 : 224 - 239
  • [36] APOLLO: A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Tool in Support of Climate Policy
    Labella, Alvaro
    Koasidis, Konstantinos
    Nikas, Alexandros
    Arsenopoulos, Apostolos
    Doukas, Haris
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2020, 13 (01) : 1539 - 1553
  • [37] Multi-criteria group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Wang, Chao
    Tian, Xuedong
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 36 : 1 - 23
  • [38] Application of multi-criteria group decision-making for water quality management
    Ahvazi, Amin Karbasi
    Ebadi, Taghi
    Zarghami, Mahdi
    Hashemi, Seyed Hossein
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (08)
  • [39] Social network group decision-making method based on stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis for probabilistic linguistic term sets
    Xu, Zhiwei
    Xu, Haiyan
    Li, Peng
    Wei, Cuiping
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2024, 681
  • [40] A Novel Two-Stage Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Self-Confidence Levels
    Ji, Ying
    Xu, Yuan
    Qu, Shaojian
    Xu, Zeshui
    Wu, Zhong
    Nabe, Mohamed
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 46 (02) : 1561 - 1584