Two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making for wind-photovoltaic-hydropower scheduling

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Weifeng [1 ]
Guo, Xuning [1 ]
Xing, Xigang [1 ]
Jiang, Chenhui [1 ]
Li, Jieyu [2 ]
Lu, Qingwen [3 ]
Li, Yunling [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Planning & D, Beijing 100120, Peoples R China
[2] YRCC, Yellow River Inst Hydraul Res, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Municipal Water Bur, Shanghai 201699, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Stochastic multi-criteria decision making; SMAA; Uncertainty; Wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems; OPERATION; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL; MCDM;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.068
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower systems is a complex multi-objective collaborative problem which requires multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to assist in formulating the most-preferred scheduling scheme. There are uncertainties existing in criteria weights (CWs) due to the limitations of the knowledge level of decision makers and the subjectivity of preferences. This paper proposes a two-stage stochastic multi-criteria group decision making model considering the uncertainties in the decision making environment and the progression of the decision making process. For the prophase decision making (the first stage), the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) theory and the MCDM model VIKOR are combined to construct a SMAA-VIKOR model for inverse weight space analysis on the situation that the initial CW information is completely unknown. In the second stage of decision making, the decision makers are allowed to express their fuzzy preferences based on the information provided in the first stage by coupling the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP) into the SMAA-VIKOR model to obtain the final scheme. The wind-photovoltaic-hydropower system in Yalong River Basin is selected as the case study. Results show that among the 12 alternative schemes, scheme A2 is ranked first with the probability of 0.69 in the first stage while the probability of taking the first ranking in the second stage is increased to 1. More explicit ranking results are obtained based on the results of the first stage, which effectively enhances the confidence of decision makers and improves decision making efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:3732 / 3742
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Multi-criteria decision-making model for assessment of large photovoltaic farms in Brazil
    Rediske, Graciele
    Siluk, Julio Cezar M.
    Michels, Leandro
    Rigo, Paula D.
    Rosa, Carmen B.
    Cugler, Gilberto
    ENERGY, 2020, 197 (197)
  • [12] An integrated multi-criteria group decision making process: selection of the chief accountant
    Kersuliene, Violeta
    Turskis, Zenonas
    2ND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION 2013, 2014, 110 : 897 - 904
  • [13] A heterogeneous QUALIFLEX method with criteria interaction for multi-criteria group decision making
    Liang, Yingying
    Qin, Jindong
    Martinez, Luis
    Liu, Jun
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 512 : 1481 - 1502
  • [14] Group Decision-Making Using Improved Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Credit Risk Analysis
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    FILOMAT, 2016, 30 (15) : 4135 - 4150
  • [15] Grey stochastic multi-criteria decision-making based on regret theory and TOPSIS
    Zhou, Huan
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    Zhang, Hong-yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2017, 8 (02) : 651 - 664
  • [16] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Hybrid Operation of Wind Farms
    Dhiman, Harsh S.
    Deb, Dipankar
    Muresan, Vlad
    Unguresan, Mihaela-Ligia
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (05):
  • [17] Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data
    Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Turskis, Zenonas
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 33 (03) : 1627 - 1638
  • [18] Multi-objective workflow scheduling scheme: a multi-criteria decision making approach
    Madhu Sudan Kumar
    Abhinav Tomar
    Prasanta K. Jana
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2021, 12 : 10789 - 10808
  • [19] Multi-objective workflow scheduling scheme: a multi-criteria decision making approach
    Kumar, Madhu Sudan
    Tomar, Abhinav
    Jana, Prasanta K.
    JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 12 (12) : 10789 - 10808
  • [20] MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION MAKING IN THE SUPPLIER SELECTION OF CAPITAL PARTS
    Rodrigues, Marcio
    Sirova, Eva
    MM SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2019, 2019 : 3690 - 3694