Fake news agenda in the era of COVID-19: Identifying trends through fact-checking content

被引:0
作者
Ceron W. [1 ]
de-Lima-Santos M.-F. [2 ]
Quiles M.G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Federal University of Sao Paulo, UNIFESP, Av. Cesare Mansueto Giulio Lattes, São José dos Campos
[2] University of Navarra, Campus Universitario s/n, Pamplona
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Computational method; COVID-19; Fact-checking; Fake news; Infodemic; Pandemic; Social network; Twitter;
D O I
10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100116
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The rise of social media has ignited an unprecedented circulation of false information in our society. It is even more evident in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Fact-checking efforts have significantly expanded and have been touted as among the most promising solutions to fake news. Several studies have reported the development of fact-checking organizations in Western societies, albeit little attention has been given to the Global South. Here, to fill this gap, we introduce a novel Markov-inspired computational method for identifying topics in tweets. In contrast to other topic modeling approaches, our method clusters topics and their current evolution in a predefined time window. To conduct our experiments, we collected data from Twitter accounts of two Brazilian fact-checking outlets and presented the topics debunked by these initiatives in fortnights throughout the pandemic. By comparing these organizations, we could identify similarities and differences in what was shared by them. Our method resulted in an important technique to cluster topics in a wide range of scenarios, including an infodemic – a period overabundance of the same information. In particular, our results revealed a complex intertwining between politics and the health crisis during this period. We conclude by proposing a novel method which, in our opinion, is suitable for topic modeling and also an agenda for future research. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Carpanez J., Veja o passo a passo da notícia falsa que acabou em tragédia em Guarujá, (2018)
[2]  
Schapals A.K., Fake news: Australian and british journalists’ role perceptions in an era of alternative facts, J. Pract., 12, 8, pp. 976-985, (2018)
[3]  
Lazer D.M., Baum M.A., Benkler Y., Berinsky A.J., Greenhill K.M., Menczer F., Metzger M.J., Nyhan B., Pennycook G., Rothschild D., Schudson M., Sloman S.A., Sunstein C.R., Thorson E.A., Watts D.J., Zittrain J.L., The science of fake news: Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort, Science, 359, 6380, pp. 1094-1096, (2018)
[4]  
Tandoc E.C., Lim Z.W., Ling R., Defining fake news: A typology of scholarly definitions, Digit. J., 6, 2, pp. 137-153, (2018)
[5]  
WHO, UN tackles ‘infodemic’ of misinformation and cybercrime in COVID-19 crisis, (2020)
[6]  
Tandoc E.C., The facts of fake news: A research review, Sociol. Compass, 13, 9, (2019)
[7]  
Tambuscio M., Oliveira D.F.M., Ciampaglia G.L., Ruffo G., Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact-checking, J. Comput. Soc. Sci., 1, 2, pp. 261-275, (2018)
[8]  
Dobbs M., The Rise of Political Fact-Checking: How Reagan Inspired a Journalistic Movement: A Reporter'a Eye View: Tech. Rep., (2012)
[9]  
Walter D., Ophir Y., News frame analysis: An inductive mixed-method computational approach, Commun. Methods Meas., 13, 4, pp. 248-266, (2019)
[10]  
Flew T., Iosifidis P., Populism, globalisation and social media, Int. Commun. Gazette, 82, 1, pp. 7-25, (2020)