Proton dose calculation with LSTM networks in presence of a magnetic field

被引:2
|
作者
Radonic, Domagoj [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Fan [1 ]
Wahl, Niklas [3 ,4 ]
Voss, Luke [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Neishabouri, Ahmad [4 ,6 ]
Delopoulos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Marschner, Sebastian [1 ]
Corradini, Stefanie [1 ]
Belka, Claus [1 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Dedes, George [2 ]
Kurz, Christopher [1 ]
Landry, Guillaume [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Med Phys, Munich, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Med Phys Radiat Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Inst Radiat Oncol HIRO, Natl Ctr Radiat Oncol NCRO, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Ruprecht Karl Univ Heidelberg, Inst Comp Sci, Heidelberg, Germany
[6] German Canc Res Ctr, Clin Cooperat Unit Radiat Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
[7] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
[8] LMU Univ Hosp Munich, Munich, Germany
[9] Bavarian Canc Res Ctr BZKF, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
dose calculation; deep learning; MR-guided proton therapy; treatment planning; LSTM; MONTE-CARLO; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; THERAPY; SENSITIVITY; FEASIBILITY; DEFLECTION; PLANS; MRI;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad7f1e
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. To present a long short-term memory (LSTM) network-based dose calculation method for magnetic resonance (MR)-guided proton therapy. Approach. 35 planning computed tomography (CT) images of prostate cancer patients were collected for Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation under a perpendicular 1.5 T magnetic field. Proton pencil beams (PB) at three energies (150, 175, and 200 MeV) were simulated (7560 PBs at each energy). A 3D relative stopping power cuboid covering the extent of the PB dose was extracted and given as input to the LSTM model, yielding a 3D predicted PB dose. Three single-energy (SE) LSTM models were trained separately on the corresponding 150/175/200 MeV datasets and a multi-energy (ME) LSTM model with an energy embedding layer was trained on either the combined dataset with three energies or a continuous energy (CE) dataset with 1 MeV steps ranging from 125 to 200 MeV. For each model, training and validation involved 25 patients and 10 patients were for testing. Two single field uniform dose prostate treatment plans were optimized and recalculated with MC and the CE model. Results. Test results of all PBs from the three SE models showed a mean gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm, 10% dose cutoff) above 99.9% with an average center-of-mass (COM) discrepancy below 0.4 mm between predicted and simulated trajectories. The ME model showed a mean gamma passing rate exceeding 99.8% and a COM discrepancy of less than 0.5 mm at the three energies. Treatment plan recalculation by the CE model yielded gamma passing rates of 99.6% and 97.9%. The inference time of the models was 9-10 ms per PB. Significance. LSTM models for proton dose calculation in a magnetic field were developed and showed promising accuracy and efficiency for prostate cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of out-of-field absorbed dose and equivalent dose in proton fields
    Clasie, Ben
    Wroe, Andrew
    Kooy, Hanne
    Depauw, Nicolas
    Flanz, Jay
    Paganetti, Harald
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (01) : 311 - 321
  • [42] The influence of physical wedges on penumbra and in-field dose uniformity in ocular proton beams
    Baker, Colin
    Kacperek, Andrzej
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (04): : 612 - 617
  • [43] Proton dose calculation on cone-beam computed tomography using unsupervised 3D deep learning networks
    Vestergaard, Casper Dueholm
    Elstrom, Ulrik Vindelev
    Muren, Ludvig Paul
    Ren, Jintao
    Norrevang, Ole
    Jensen, Kenneth
    Taasti, Vicki Trier
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 32
  • [44] Impact of proton dose calculation algorithms on the interplay effect in PBS proton based SBRT lung plans
    Rana, Suresh
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [45] Validation of a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation engine including the 1.5 T magnetic field for independent dose-check in MRgRT
    Ruggieri, Ruggero
    Bianchi, Nicola
    Gurrera, Davide
    Naccarato, Stefania
    Borgese, Riccardo Filippo
    De Simone, Antonio
    Sicignano, Gianluisa
    Stavrev, Pavel
    Stavreva, Nadejda
    Pellegrini, Roberto
    Rigo, Michele
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Nicosia, Luca
    Pastorello, Edoardo
    Allegra, Andrea
    De-Colle, Chiara
    Alongi, Filippo
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 130
  • [46] Experimental evaluation of a spatial resampling technique to improve the accuracy of pencil-beam dose calculation in proton therapy
    Egashira, Yusuke
    Nishio, Teiji
    Matsuura, Taeko
    Kameoka, Satoru
    Uesaka, Mitsuru
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4104 - 4114
  • [47] Synthetic computed tomography based dose calculation in prostate cancer patients with hip prostheses for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy
    Koivula, Lauri
    Seppala, Tiina
    Collan, Juhani
    Visapaa, Harri
    Tenhunen, Mikko
    Korhonen, Arthur
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 27
  • [48] A simplified Monte Carlo algorithm considering large-angle scattering for fast and accurate calculation of proton dose
    Takayanagi, Taisuke
    Hirayama, Shusuke
    Fujitaka, Shinichiro
    Fujimoto, Rintaro
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (01): : 60 - 72
  • [49] Virtual particle Monte Carlo: A new concept to avoid simulating secondary particles in proton therapy dose calculation
    Shan, Jie
    Feng, Hongying
    Morales, Danairis Hernandez
    Patel, Samir H.
    Wong, William W.
    Fatyga, Mirek
    Bues, Martin
    Schild, Steven E.
    Foote, Robert L.
    Liu, Wei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (10) : 6666 - 6683
  • [50] Requirements for dose calculation on an active scanned proton beamline for small, shallow fields
    Knaeusl, B.
    Langgartner, L.
    Stock, M.
    Janson, M.
    Furutani, K. M.
    Beltran, C. J.
    Georg, D.
    Resch, A. F.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 113