A Comparison of the short-term settling of three scleral lens designs

被引:63
作者
机构
[1] University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX
[2] Private Practice, Traverse City, MI
[3] University of Missouri-St. Louis College of Optometry, St. Louis, MO
[4] University of Houston College of Optometry, 505 J Davis Armistead Bldg, Houston, 77204, TX
来源
| 1600年 / Lippincott Williams and Wilkins卷 / 91期
关键词
Contact lenses; Jupiter; Msd; Onefit P&A; Scleral lenses;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000409
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose. Scleral gas-permeable lenses are rapidly gaining international popularity. Unlike corneal gas-permeable lenses, scleral lenses are fitted to the bulbar conjunctiva and settle into the tissue after insertion. To date, we are unaware of any studies examining the settling behavior of three varying scleral lens designs. The purpose of this study was to quantify the mean total settling and mean rates of settling for three scleral lens designs: Onefit P&A (Blanchard Contact Lens, Inc), Mini Scleral Design (msd) (Blanchard Contact Lens, Inc), and Jupiter (Visionary Optics). Methods. A randomized, repeated-measures study of Onefit P&A, msd, and Jupiter was performed. Subjects were fitted from a trial lens set, according to the manufacturer's guidelines. After insertion, lens settling was measured at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 8 hours. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance and two-stage, nonlinear regression analyses of settling over time. Results. On average, the Onefit P&A, msd, and Jupiter lenses settled a total of 113.7, 133.7, and 88.1 μm, respectively. Although the rates of settling were not linear, analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in the average settling rates (p < 0.05) among the groups. Tukey analyses revealed a significant difference in the settling rates for msd and Jupiter comparison (p < 0.05). Nonlinear regression analyses predicted that the lenses settled to about 80% of the final estimated values for the Onefit P&A lens, 90% for msd, and 99% for the Jupiter, after 8 hours. Conclusion. We concluded that the amount of settling varied significantly among the three lens designs. Settling rates were greatest shortly after insertion. Larger lenses were estimated to be settled by 8 hours. Based on the results of this short-term study, careful consideration to the settling patterns of individual scleral lens designs should be given. Copyright © American Academy of Optometry.
引用
收藏
页码:1462 / 1466
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Bennett E.S., GP annual report 2013, Contact Lens Spectrum, 28, pp. 20-29, (2013)
  • [2] Sindt C.W., Basic scleral lens fitting and design, Contact Lens Spectrum, 23, pp. 32-36, (2008)
  • [3] Van Der Worp E., A guide to scleral lens fitting, Scleral Lens Society, (2014)
  • [4] De Naeyer G.W., A new way to classify scleral contact lenses, Contact Lens Spectrum, 26, (2011)
  • [5] Segal O., Barkana Y., Hourovitz D., Behrman S., Kamun Y., Avni I., Zadok D., Scleral contact lenses may help where other modalities fail, Cornea, 22, pp. 308-310, (2003)
  • [6] De Naeyer G.W., Jedlicka J., Schornack M.M., Scleral lenses, Clinical Manual of Contact Lenses, pp. 609-947, (2014)
  • [7] Alipour F., Kherikhah A., Mahmoud J.B., Use of mini scleral contact lenses in moderate to severe dry eye, Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 35, pp. 272-276, (2012)
  • [8] Schornack M., Baratz K.H., Patel S.V., Maquire L.J., Jupiter scleral lenses in the management of chronic graft versus host disease, Eye Contact Lens, 34, pp. 302-305, (2008)
  • [9] Jacobs D.S., Rosenthal P., Boston scleral lens prosthetic device for treatment of severe dry eye in chronic graft-versus-host disease, Cornea, 26, pp. 1195-1199, (2007)
  • [10] Sonsino J., Mathe D.S., Central vault in dry eye patients successfully wearing scleral lens, Optom Vis Sci, 90, pp. 248-251, (2013)