Nonparametric Bayesian reconstruction of Galactic magnetic fields using information field theory: The inclusion of line-of-sight information in ultrahigh-energy cosmic-ray backtracing

被引:0
作者
Tsouros, Alexandros [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bendre, Abhijit B. [4 ,5 ]
Edenhofer, Gordian [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Ensslin, Torsten [6 ,7 ]
Frank, Philipp [6 ]
Mastorakis, Michalis [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pavlidou, Vasiliki [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Crete, Dept Phys, Iraklion 70013, Greece
[2] Univ Crete, ITCP, Iraklion 70013, Greece
[3] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Inst Astrophys, Iraklion 70013, Greece
[4] EPFL, Lab Astrophys, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
[5] Scuola Normale Super Pisa, Piazza Cavalieri 7, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
[6] Max Planck Inst Astrophys, Karl Schwarzschild Str 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[7] Ludwig Maximilian Univ Munich, Geschwister Scholl Pl 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[8] Univ Vienna, Dept Astrophys, Turkenschanzstr 17, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
astroparticle physics; ISM: magnetic fields; local insterstellar matter; INTERSTELLAR DUST; SCALE ANISOTROPY; MOLECULAR CLOUD; GAIA; MAPS; SKY; 3D; POLARIZATION; TOMOGRAPHY; DYNAMO;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202449933
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) are charged particles with energies surpassing 10(18) eV. Their sources remain elusive because they are obscured by deflections caused by the Galactic magnetic field (GMF). This challenge is further complicated by our limited understanding of the 3D structure of the GMF because current GMF observations primarily consist of quantities that are integrated along the line of sight (LOS). Nevertheless, data from upcoming stellar polarization surveys along with Gaia stellar parallax data are expected to yield local GMF measurements. Aims. This study is the second entry in our exploration of a Bayesian inference approach to the local GMF that uses synthetic local GMF observations that emulate forthcoming local GMF measurements, and attempts to use them to reconstruct its 3D structure. The ultimate aim is to trace back observed UHECRs and thereby update our knowledge about their possible origin. Methods. In this proof-of-concept work, we assumed as ground truth a magnetic field produced by a dynamo simulation of the Galactic ISM. We employed methods of Bayesian statistical inference in order to sample the posterior distribution of the GMF within part of the Galaxy. By assuming a known rigidity and arrival direction of an UHECR, we traced its trajectory back through various GMF configurations drawn from the posterior distribution. Our objective was to rigorously evaluate the performance of our algorithm in scenarios that closely mirror the setting of expected future applications. In pursuit of this, we conditioned the posterior to synthetically integrated LOS measurements of the GMF, in addition to synthetic local plane of sky-component measurements. Results. Our results demonstrate that for all locations of the observed arrival direction on the plane of sky, our algorithm is able to substantially update our knowledge on the original arrival direction of UHECRs with a rigidity of E/Z = 5 x 10(19) eV, even without any LOS information. When the integrated data are included in the inference, the regions of the celestial sphere in which the maximum error occurs are greatly reduced. The maximum error is diminished by a factor of about 3 even in these regions in the specific setting we studied. Additionally, we are able to identify the regions in which the largest error is expected to occur.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [11] MAGNETIC FIELDS IN SPIRAL ARMS
    CHANDRASEKHAR, S
    FERMI, E
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1953, 118 (01) : 113 - 115
  • [12] Mapping the Magnetic Interstellar Medium in Three Dimensions over the Full Sky with Neutral Hydrogen
    Clark, S. E.
    Hensley, Brandon S.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 887 (02)
  • [13] THE STRENGTH OF INTERSTELLAR MAGNETIC FIELDS
    DAVIS, L
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1951, 81 (05): : 890 - 891
  • [14] 2022 report from the Auger-TA working group on UHECR arrival directions
    di Matteo, A.
    Anchordoqui, L.
    Bister, T.
    de Almeida, R.
    Deligny, O.
    Deval, L.
    Farrar, G.
    Giaccari, U.
    Golup, G.
    Higuchi, R.
    Kim, J.
    Kuznetsov, M.
    Maris, I.
    Rubtsov, G.
    Tinyakov, P.
    Urban, F.
    [J]. ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS, UHECR 2022, 2023, 283
  • [15] Tomographic Imaging of the Sagittarius Spiral Arm's Magnetic Field Structure
    Doi, Yasuo
    Nakamura, Kengo
    Kawabata, Koji S.
    Matsumura, Masafumi
    Akitaya, Hiroshi
    Coude, Simon
    Rodrigues, Claudia V.
    Kwon, Jungmi
    Tamura, Motohide
    Tahani, Mehrnoosh
    Magalhaes, Antonio Mario
    Santos-Lima, Reinaldo
    Angarita, Yenifer
    Versteeg, Jose
    Haverkorn, Marijke
    Hasegawa, Tetsuo
    Sadavoy, Sarah
    Arzoumanian, Doris
    Bastien, Pierre
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 961 (01)
  • [16] Two-component Magnetic Field along the Line of Sight to the Perseus Molecular Cloud: Contribution of the Foreground Taurus Molecular Cloud
    Doi, Yasuo
    Hasegawa, Tetsuo
    Bastien, Pierre
    Tahani, Mehrnoosh
    Arzoumanian, Doris
    Coude, Simon
    Matsumura, Masafumi
    Sadavoy, Sarah
    Hull, Charles L. H.
    Shimajiri, Yoshito
    Furuya, Ray S.
    Johnstone, Doug
    Plume, Rene
    Inutsuka, Shu-ichiro
    Kwon, Jungmi
    Tamura, Motohide
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 914 (02)
  • [17] Edenhofer G., 2024, Journal of Open Source Software, V9, P6593, DOI DOI 10.21105/JOSS.06593
  • [18] A parsec-scale Galactic 3D dust map out to 1.25 kpc from the Sun
    Edenhofer, Gordian
    Zucker, Catherine
    Frank, Philipp
    Saydjari, Andrew K.
    Speagle, Joshua S.
    Finkbeiner, Douglas
    Ensslin, Torsten A.
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2024, 685
  • [19] Enlin T. A., 2019, Ann. Phys, V531, P1970017
  • [20] Information Field Theory and Artificial Intelligence
    Ensslin, Torsten
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2022, 24 (03)