Treatment of high concentration piggery wastewater by ABR-MAP-MBR process

被引:0
作者
Nie L. [1 ]
Li D. [1 ]
He J. [2 ]
Zhong H. [1 ]
Lin P. [1 ]
Zhou R. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Environment and Biological Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming
[2] Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
来源
Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal | 2018年 / 69卷 / 06期
关键词
Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR); Anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor (A/O-MBR); Hydraulic retention time (HRT); Magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP); Piggery wastewater;
D O I
10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171646
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Piggery wastewater is difficult to be treated due to its high concentrations of suspended solids (SS), organic matter and ammonia nitrogen. An integrated process was proposed to treat the piggery wastewater, which consists of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), magnesium-ammonium-phosphate precipitation (MAP) and anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor (A/O MBR). The influences of ABR startup conditions, hydraulic retention time (HRT), water temperature, and dissolved oxygen (DO) on the performance of pollutants removal were investigated. The MAP were used to remove the NH4-N in the wastewater discharged from the ABR. Based on the strategy of stepped-loading, the ABR process startup was finished within 60 days and after that, a 73.5% of COD removal efficiency was achieved at the HRT of 24 h and temperature of 25-35℃. Effluents from the ABR were treated by the MAP using magnesium chloride and trisodium phosphate as precipitant. At the optimum conditions that the molar ratio of reagent dosing Mg2+:NH4+:PO43-was 1.2:1:0.95 at the pH value of 8.5-9.0, the removal efficiency of COD, NH4-N and PO43--P reached 28.2%, 85.4%, and 89.7% respectively. At an optimized HRT (16 h) and DO (≥3.0 mg·L-1) in the A/O-MBR, the removal efficiency of COD, SS, NH4-N and TN was 82.0%, 95.2%, 72.4% and 67.7%, respectively. As a result, the final effluent quality, including SS, COD, TN and TP, well met the first class standard of the “Discharge standard of pollutants for livestock and poultry breeding” (GB 18596-2001), demonstrating that the new integrated process proposed in this paper was very promising for the treatment of piggery wastewater. © 2018, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2722 / 2729
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Zhang S.L., Song Y.X., Problems, countermeasures and prospects of livestock industry in China, Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 35, 11, pp. 6-11, (2014)
[2]  
China Statistical Yearbook, (2016)
[3]  
Lin D.Y., Ye M.F., Wu F.L., Et al., Recycling model construction and technology integration of feces from large-scale pig farm, Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 29, 2, pp. 386-391, (2010)
[4]  
Wang L., Deng L.W., Wang S., Et al., Research and application status of aerobic treatment for the anaerobic effluent of animal wastewater, China Biogas, 33, 5, pp. 3-10, (2015)
[5]  
Sun W., Latest advances of wastewater treatment process of large scale hoggery from a broad and home, Environmental Science Survey, 26, 6, pp. 68-70, (2007)
[6]  
Zhang M., Lawlor P.G., Wu G., Et al., Partial nitrification and nutrient removal in intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors treating separated digestate liquid after anaerobic digestion of pig manure, Bioprocess Biosystems Engineering, 34, 6, pp. 1049-1056, (2011)
[7]  
Delgado S., Villarroel R., Gonzalez E., Effect of the shear intensity on fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment, Journal of Membrane Science, 311, 1-2, pp. 173-181, (2008)
[8]  
Mohammed T.A., Birima A.H., Noor M.J.M.M., Et al., Evaluation of using membrane bioreactor for treating municipal wastewater at different operating conditions, Desalination, 221, 1-3, pp. 502-510, (2008)
[9]  
Lettinga G., Field J., Lier J.V., Et al., Advanced anaerobic wastewater treatment in the near future, Water Science and Technology, 35, 10, pp. 5-12, (1997)
[10]  
Sarathai Y., Koottatep T., Morel A., Hydraulic characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor as onsite wastewater treatment system, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 22, 9, pp. 1319-1326, (2010)