Study on structure optimization of heat exchanger and evaluation index of heat transfer performance

被引:0
|
作者
Liu X. [1 ]
Zhang S. [2 ]
Zhou Z. [2 ]
Zheng H. [2 ]
Wang C. [2 ]
Shi H. [3 ]
Li M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Military Representation Office of Military Representative Bureau of Naval Equipment Department in Wuhan Area, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei
[2] China Ship Development and Design Center, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei
[3] MOE Key Laboratory of Thermal Fluid Science and Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi
来源
关键词
Design; Evaluation index; Experimental validation; Heat exchanger; Heat transfer; Optimization;
D O I
10.11949/0438-1157.20191189
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are some problems in the cooler of a launch vehicle. Firstly, the pressure loss of the shell side is large. Secondly, the segmental baffle structure makes the working substance flow in Z-shape. It is easy to form a dead zone behind the baffle, which promotes scaling on the shell side and reduces the overall heat transfer performance of the heat exchanger. Two heat transfer enhancement schemes for shell-side structures are proposed in this paper. The first scheme is to reduce the number of segmental baffles and increase the baffle spacing. The second scheme is to replace the original baffles with helical baffles. In order to verify the accuracy of the thermodynamic design method adopted in this paper, the thermodynamic design method of segmental baffle and helical baffle shell-and-tube heat exchangers are verified according to the experimental results in literature. The results show that the deviation between the experimental results and the calculated data obtained by the thermodynamic design method in this paper is within 37%, which meets engineering requirement. According to different optimization parameters, the optimization results are different. There is basically a following rule: the optimal design can reduce the total pressure drop on both shell and tube sides of heat exchanger, but its heat transfer performance decreases at the same time. Therefore, a comprehensive index is needed for evaluation. In this paper, the ratio of heat transfer Q to power consumption caused by flow resistance of heat exchanger is proposed as a comprehensive performance evaluation index. This index indicates that exchanging heat quantity obtained by heat transfer system per unit pump power. The larger the value, the better the economy. After calculation, it is found that the comprehensive evaluation index of the optimal scheme is increased by about 22.2% compared with the original scheme. © All Right Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 105
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Stehlik P, Wadekar V V., Different strategies to improve industrial heat exchange, Heat Transfer Engineering, 23, 6, pp. 36-48, (2002)
  • [2] Bergles A., Heat transfer enhancement-the maturing of second-generation heat transfer technology, Heat Transfer Engineering, 18, 1, pp. 47-55, (1997)
  • [3] Guo Z Y, Tao W Q, Shah R K., The field synergy (coordination) principle and its applications in enhancing single phase convective heat transfer, International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 48, 9, pp. 1797-1807, (2005)
  • [4] Bergles A E., ExHFT for fourth generation heat transfer technology, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 26, 2, pp. 335-344, (2002)
  • [5] Guo Z Y., Mechanism and control of convective heat transfer-coordination of velocity and heat flow fields, Science Bulletin, 45, 19, pp. 2118-2122, (2000)
  • [6] Bell K J., Heat exchanger design for the process industries, Journal of Heat Transfer, 126, 6, pp. 877-885, (2005)
  • [7] Schlunder E U., Heat Exchanger Design Handbook, pp. 210-213, (1983)
  • [8] Lutcha J, Nemcansky J., Performance improvement of tubular heat exchangers by helical baffles, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 68, 3, pp. 263-270, (1990)
  • [9] Prithiviraj M, Andrews M J., Three dimensional numerical simulation of shell-and-tube heat exchangers (Part Ⅰ): Foundation and fluid mechanics, Numerical Heat Transfer: Part A Applications, 33, 8, pp. 799-816, (1998)
  • [10] Prithiviraj M, Andrews M J., Three-dimensional numerical simulation of shell-and-tube heat exchangers (Part Ⅱ): Heat transfer, Numerical Heat Transfer: Part A Applications, 33, 8, pp. 817-828, (1998)