A quantitative incentive mechanism to eliminate change orders in construction projects

被引：0
作者：
Ma Z. [1 ]
Ma J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing
来源：
| 2016年 / Science Press卷 / 44期
关键词：
Building information modeling (BIM); Change orders; Incentive mechanism; Integrated project delivery (IPD); Project settlement;
D O I：
10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2016.08.021
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Change orders are the main cause of over budget cost. A project delivery mode called IPD (Integrated Project Delivery) can eliminate change orders in foreign construction projects, because its internal incentive mechanism based on principles of IPD can prompt contractors participating in the design phase to assist designers in optimizing design actively. In previous study, an IPD-based qualitative incentive mechanism adapting the situation of construction projects in China was established to eliminate change orders. First, this paper summarized the qualitative incentive mechanism. Then, by analyzing the characteristics of change orders that would be eliminated by designers and contractors in China, established a quantitative incentive mechanism based on the qualitative one. Finally, it verified the effectiveness of the quantitative incentive mechanism with the financial data of actual projects. © 2016, Editorial Department of Journal of Tongji University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1280 / 1285
页数：5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Fang J., Study on controlling of construction project change, (2005)
  • [2] Li J., Research of the influence of change orders on cost based on valuation with bill quantity, (2012)
  • [3] Zhang J., Research on the conduction mechanism of the variation's influence on final payment, (2010)
  • [4] Gao B., Design of contract management changes/claims for international general contract project, (2012)
  • [5] Integrated project delivery: A guide 2007 version 1
  • [6] El Asmar M., Hanna A.S., Loh W.Y., Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139, 11, (2013)
  • [7] Department of Treasury and Finance, In pursuit of additional value: A benchmarking study into alliancing in the Australian public sector, (2009)
  • [8] Thomsen C., Darrington J., Dunne D., Et al., Managing integrated project delivery, (2009)
  • [9] The ACA standard form of contract for project partnering introduction and explanatory notes
  • [10] Department of Treasury and Finance, The practitioners guide to alliance contracting, (2010)
12