Survey of Text Stance Detection

被引:0
作者
Li Y. [1 ]
Sun Y. [1 ]
Jing W. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Information and Computer Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin
来源
Jing, Weipeng (jwp@nefu.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Science Press卷 / 58期
基金
黑龙江省自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Opinion mining; Stance; Stance detection; Target; Text;
D O I
10.7544/issn1000-1239.2021.20200518
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Text stance detection is a basic study of text opinion mining, which aims to analyze the stance expressed in the text towards a specific target. Due to the rapid development of the Internet, the discussions of users for public events and consumer products are growing exponentially. The research of text stance detection is of great importance for product marketing and public opinion decision-making. This paper reviews the research of text stance detection from three angles: target type, text granularity and research method. First, from the perspective of target type, this paper focuses on three aspects: single-target stance detection, multi-target stance detection and cross-target stance detection; from the perspective of text granularity, the paper compares different application scenarios and methods of sentence level stance detection, document level stance detection and debate text stance detection; from the perspective of research methods, the paper introduces the traditional machine learning, topic model, deep learning and "two-stage" methods, and points out the advantages and disadvantages of various methods. Then, the evaluation tasks of text stance detection and the open data resources are summarized. Finally, based on the current research, the paper summarizes the application fields and looks forward to the future development trends and challenges of text stance detection. © 2021, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2538 / 2557
页数:19
相关论文
共 86 条
[21]  
Conforti C, Pilehvar M T, Collier N., Towards automatic fake news detection: Cross-level stance detection in news articles, Proc of the 1st Workshop on Fact Extraction and Verification, pp. 40-49, (2018)
[22]  
Hasan K S, Ng V., Stance classification of ideological debates: Data, models, features, and constraints, Proc of the 6th Int Joint Conf on Natural Language Processing, pp. 1348-1356, (2013)
[23]  
Gottipati S, Qiu Minghui, Sim Y, Et al., Learning topics and positions from Debatepedia, Proc of the 2013 Conf on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1858-1868, (2013)
[24]  
Somasundaran S, Wiebe J., Recognizing stances in ideological online debates, Proc of the 2010 NAACL-HLT, pp. 116-124, (2010)
[25]  
Liu Bing, Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions, (2017)
[26]  
Hasan K S, Ng V., Predicting stance in ideological debate with rich linguistic knowledge, Proc of Int Conf on Computational Linguistics, pp. 451-460, (2012)
[27]  
Yuan Jianhua, ZhaoYanyan, Xu Jingfang, Et al., Exploring answer stance detection with recurrent conditional attention, Proc of Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 7426-7433, (2019)
[28]  
Murakami A, Raymond R., Support or oppose? Classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions, Proc of the 23rd Int Conf on Computational Linguistics, pp. 869-875, (2010)
[29]  
Durmus E, Ladhak F, Cardie C., Determining relative argument specificity and stance for complex argumentative structures, (2019)
[30]  
Xu Jiaming, Zheng Suncong, Shi Jing, Et al., Ensemble of feature sets and classification methods for stance detection, Proc of the ICCPOL 2016, Co-Located with NLPCC 2016, pp. 679-688, (2016)