Systematic Review of Quantitative Risk Quantification Methods in Construction Accidents

被引:1
作者
Kumi, Louis [1 ]
Jeong, Jaewook [1 ]
Jeong, Jaemin [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Safety Engn, 232 Gongneung Ro, Seoul 01811, South Korea
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil & Mineral Engn, 27 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
construction safety; accident risk analysis; quantitative methods; risk assessment; systematic review; artificial intelligence; SAFETY; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; INDUSTRY; CLASSIFICATION; INCIDENTS; BEHAVIOR; EVENTS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/buildings14103306
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Construction accidents pose significant risks to workers and the public, affecting industry productivity and reputation. While several reviews have discussed risk assessment methods, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, and real-time decision support systems have created a need for an updated synthesis of the quantitative methodologies applied in construction safety. This study systematically reviews the literature from the past decade, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A thorough search identified studies utilizing statistical analysis, mathematical modeling, simulation, and artificial intelligence (AI). These methods were categorized and analyzed based on their effectiveness and limitations. Statistical approaches, such as correlation analysis, examined relationships between variables, while mathematical models, like factor analysis, quantified risk factors. Simulation methods, such as Monte Carlo simulations, explored risk dynamics and AI techniques, including machine learning, enhanced predictive modeling, and decision making in construction safety. This review highlighted the strengths of handling large datasets and improving accuracy, but also noted challenges like data quality and methodological limitations. Future research directions are suggested to address these gaps. This study contributes to construction safety management by offering an overview of best practices and opportunities for advancing quantitative risk assessment methodologies.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Analysis of trends in construction research: 1985-2002
    Abudayyeh, O
    Dibert-DeYoung, A
    Jaselskis, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 130 (03) : 433 - 439
  • [2] A bibliometric review of the status and emerging research trends in construction safety management technologies
    Akinlolu, Mariam
    Haupt, Theo C.
    Edwards, David John
    Simpeh, Fredrick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22 (14) : 2699 - 2711
  • [3] PPE non-compliance among construction workers: An assessment of contributing factors utilizing fuzzy theory
    Al-Bayati, Ahmed Jalil
    Rener, Andrew T.
    Listello, Michael P.
    Mohamed, Mamdouh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2023, 85 : 242 - 253
  • [4] Precursors of Construction Fatalities. II: Predictive Modeling and Empirical Validation
    Alexander, Dillon
    Hallowell, Matthew
    Gambatese, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 143 (07)
  • [5] Worksite Accident Impacts on Construction and Infrastructure: Nondeterministic Analysis of Subsectors and Organization Sizes
    Alkaissy, Maryam
    Arashpour, Mehrdad
    Zeynalian, Mehran
    Li, Heng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 148 (06)
  • [6] Simulation-based analysis of occupational health and safety continuous improvement (OHSCI) in modern construction and infrastructure industries
    Alkaissy, Maryam
    Arashpour, Mehrdad
    Rashidi, Ali
    Mohandes, Saeed Reza
    Farnood, Pedram
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 134
  • [7] The Cost Burden of Safety Risk Incidents on Construction: A Probabilistic Quantification Method
    Alkaissy, Maryam
    Arashpour, Mehrdad
    Wakefield, Ron
    Hosseini, Reza
    Gill, Peter
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2022, 42 (10) : 2312 - 2326
  • [8] Risk Perception Comparison among Construction Safety Professionals: Delphi Perspective
    Alomari, Kasim A.
    Gambatese, John A.
    Tymvios, Nicholas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 144 (12)
  • [9] Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews
    Amir-Behghadami, Mehrdad
    Janati, Ali
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2020, 37 (06) : 387 - 387
  • [10] Fuzzy probabilistic expert system for occupational hazard assessment in construction
    Amiri, Mehran
    Ardeshir, Abdollah
    Zarandi, Mohammad Hossein Fazel
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 93 : 16 - 28