The mean solar butterfly diagram and poloidal field generation rate at the surface of the Sun

被引:2
作者
Cloutier, S. [1 ]
Cameron, R. H. [1 ]
Gizon, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Sonnensyst Forsch, Justus Von Liebig Weg 3, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Inst Astrophys & Geophys, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Sun: activity; Sun: magnetic fields; MAGNETIC-FIELDS; MERIDIONAL FLOW; BUOYANCY;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202450739
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. The difference between individual solar cycles in the magnetic butterfly diagram can mostly be ascribed to the stochasticity of the emergence process. Aims. We aim to obtain the expectation value of the butterfly diagram from observations of four cycles. This allows us to further determine the generation rate of the surface radial magnetic field. Methods. We used data from Wilcox Solar Observatory to generate time-latitude diagrams of the surface radial and toroidal magnetic fields spanning cycles 21-24. We symmetrized them across the equator and cycle-averaged them. From the mean butterfly diagram and surface toroidal field, we then inferred the mean poloidal field generation rate at the surface of the Sun. Results. The averaging procedure removes realization noise from individual cycles. The amount of emerging flux required to account for the evolution of the surface radial field is found to match that provided by the observed surface toroidal field and Joy's law. Conclusions. Cycle-averaging butterfly diagrams removes realization noise and artefacts due to imperfect scale separation and corresponds to an ensemble average that can be interpreted in the mean-field framework. The result can then be directly compared to alpha Omega-type dynamo models. The Babcock-Leighton alpha-effect is consistent with observations, a result that can be appreciated only if the observational data are averaged in some way.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   An 'extended solar cycle' as observed in Fe XIV [J].
Altrock, RC .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1997, 170 (02) :411-423
[2]  
Ananthakrishnan R., 1954, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A, V40, P72
[3]   THE TOPOLOGY OF THE SUNS MAGNETIC FIELD AND THE 22-YEAR CYCLE [J].
BABCOCK, HW .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1961, 133 (02) :572-&
[4]   Observationally Guided Models for the Solar Dynamo and the Role of the Surface Field [J].
Cameron R.H. ;
Schüssler M. .
Space Science Reviews, 2023, 219 (07)
[5]   Observing and modeling the poloidal and toroidal fields of the solar dynamo [J].
Cameron, R. H. ;
Duvall, T. L., Jr. ;
Schuessler, M. ;
Schunker, H. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2018, 609
[6]   The crucial role of surface magnetic fields for the solar dynamo [J].
Cameron, Robert ;
Schuessler, Manfred .
SCIENCE, 2015, 347 (6228) :1333-1335
[7]   THE NAKED EMERGENCE OF SOLAR ACTIVE REGIONS OBSERVED WITH SDO/HMI [J].
Centeno, Rebecca .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 759 (01)
[8]   Dynamo models of the solar cycle [J].
Charbonneau, Paul .
LIVING REVIEWS IN SOLAR PHYSICS, 2020, 17 (01)
[9]   Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle [J].
Dasi-Espuig, M. ;
Solanki, S. K. ;
Krivova, N. A. ;
Cameron, R. ;
Penuela, T. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2010, 518
[10]   THE CONCENTRATION OF THE LARGE-SCALE SOLAR MAGNETIC-FIELD BY A MERIDIONAL SURFACE FLOW [J].
DEVORE, CR ;
SHEELEY, NR ;
BORIS, JP .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1984, 92 (1-2) :1-14