A new method for probabilistic linguistic multi-attribute group decision making: Application to the selection of financial technologies

被引:119
作者
Mao X.-B. [1 ]
Wu M. [1 ]
Dong J.-Y. [2 ]
Wan S.-P. [1 ]
Jin Z. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] School of Information Technology, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang
[2] School of Statistics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang
[3] School of Science, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang
来源
Appl. Soft Comput. J. | / 155-175期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Aggregating operators; Multi-attribute group decision making; Operational laws; Probabilistic linguistic term sets;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
“No technology, no finance” has been the consensus in banking industry. Under the background of financial technology (Fintech), how to select an appropriate technology company to cooperate for the banks has become a key. The technology company selection can be regarded as a kind of multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems. The probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS) is a useful tool to express decision makers’ (DMs’) evaluations in the technology company selection. This paper develops a new method for MAGDM with PLTSs. Firstly, the possibility degree and range value of PLTSs are defined. Then a possibility degree algorithm is designed for ranking PLTSs. An Euclidean distance measure between PLTSs is presented and extended to probabilistic linguistic matrices. Based on Archimedean t-norm and s-norm, some new operational laws for PLTSs are defined and some desirable properties are discussed. Then, a generalized probabilistic linguistic Hamacher weighted averaging (GPLHWA) operator and a generalized probabilistic linguistic Hamacher ordered weighted averaging (GPLHOWA) operator are developed. Some useful properties for these operators are investigated in detail. Combined with the subjective weights of DMs, the DMs’ weights are determined by the adjusted coefficients. Using the GPLHWA operator, the collective decision matrix is obtained by aggregating all the individual decision matrices. By maximizing the total weighted square possibility degree, a multi-objective program is constructed to derive the attribute weights. The ranking order of alternatives is generated by integrating ELECTRE and TOPSIS. Thereby, a new method is put forward for MAGDM with PLTSs. A Fintech example is analyzed to show the effectiveness of the proposed method. The sensitivity analysis and comparative analyses are conducted to illustrate its advantages. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 175
页数:20
相关论文
共 63 条
[11]  
Herrera F., Herrera-Viedma E., Verdegay J.L., Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 79, 2, pp. 175-190, (1996)
[12]  
Herrera F., Martinez L., A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 8, 6, pp. 746-752, (2000)
[13]  
Wan S.P., 2-tuple linguistic hybrid arithmetic aggregation operators and application to multi-attribute group decision making, Knowl.-Based Syst., 45, pp. 31-40, (2013)
[14]  
Wan S.P., Xu G.L., Dong J.Y., Supplier selection using ANP and ELECTRE II in interval 2-tuple linguistic environment, Inform. Sci., 385-386, pp. 19-38, (2017)
[15]  
Dong J.Y., Yuan F.F., Wan S.P., Extended VIKOR method for multiple criteria decision-making with linguistic hesitant fuzzy information, Comput. Ind. Eng., 112, pp. 305-319, (2017)
[16]  
Wilbik A., Keller J.M., A fuzzy measure similarity between sets of linguistic summaries, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 21, 1, pp. 183-189, (2013)
[17]  
Bordogna G., Fedrizzi M., Pasi G., A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A, 27, 1, pp. 126-133, (1997)
[18]  
Xu Z., Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making, Omega, 33, 3, pp. 249-254, (2005)
[19]  
Xu Z., A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations, Inf. Sci., 166, 1, pp. 19-30, (2004)
[20]  
Xu Z., Wang H., On the syntax and semantics of virtual linguistic terms for information fusion in decision making, Inf. Fusion, 34, pp. 43-48, (2017)