A new method for probabilistic linguistic multi-attribute group decision making: Application to the selection of financial technologies

被引:114
作者
Mao X.-B. [1 ]
Wu M. [1 ]
Dong J.-Y. [2 ]
Wan S.-P. [1 ]
Jin Z. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] School of Information Technology, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang
[2] School of Statistics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang
[3] School of Science, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang
来源
Appl. Soft Comput. J. | / 155-175期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Aggregating operators; Multi-attribute group decision making; Operational laws; Probabilistic linguistic term sets;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
“No technology, no finance” has been the consensus in banking industry. Under the background of financial technology (Fintech), how to select an appropriate technology company to cooperate for the banks has become a key. The technology company selection can be regarded as a kind of multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems. The probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS) is a useful tool to express decision makers’ (DMs’) evaluations in the technology company selection. This paper develops a new method for MAGDM with PLTSs. Firstly, the possibility degree and range value of PLTSs are defined. Then a possibility degree algorithm is designed for ranking PLTSs. An Euclidean distance measure between PLTSs is presented and extended to probabilistic linguistic matrices. Based on Archimedean t-norm and s-norm, some new operational laws for PLTSs are defined and some desirable properties are discussed. Then, a generalized probabilistic linguistic Hamacher weighted averaging (GPLHWA) operator and a generalized probabilistic linguistic Hamacher ordered weighted averaging (GPLHOWA) operator are developed. Some useful properties for these operators are investigated in detail. Combined with the subjective weights of DMs, the DMs’ weights are determined by the adjusted coefficients. Using the GPLHWA operator, the collective decision matrix is obtained by aggregating all the individual decision matrices. By maximizing the total weighted square possibility degree, a multi-objective program is constructed to derive the attribute weights. The ranking order of alternatives is generated by integrating ELECTRE and TOPSIS. Thereby, a new method is put forward for MAGDM with PLTSs. A Fintech example is analyzed to show the effectiveness of the proposed method. The sensitivity analysis and comparative analyses are conducted to illustrate its advantages. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 175
页数:20
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Wan S.P., Wang F., Dong J.Y., A three-phase method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 26, 2, pp. 998-1010, (2018)
  • [2] Liao H., Jiang L., Xu Z., Xu J., Herrera F., A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information, Inform. Sci., 415-416, pp. 341-355, (2017)
  • [3] Wan S.P., Li D.F., Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees, Omega, 41, 6, pp. 925-940, (2013)
  • [4] Wan S.P., Wang F., Dong J.Y., Additive consistent interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and likelihood comparison algorithm based group decision making, European J. Oper. Res., 263, 2, pp. 571-582, (2017)
  • [5] Pang Q., Wang H., Xu Z., Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making, Inform. Sci., 369, pp. 128-143, (2016)
  • [6] Wan S.P., Jin Z., Dong J.Y., Pythagorean fuzzy mathematical programming method for multi-attribute group decision making with pythagorean fuzzy truth degrees, Knowl. Inf. Syst., 55, pp. 437-466, (2018)
  • [7] Pang J., Liang J., Song P., An adaptive consensus method for multi-attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment, Appl. Soft Comput., 58, pp. 339-353, (2017)
  • [8] Dong J.Y., Chen Yang Y., Wan S.P., A cosine similarity based QUALIFLEX approach with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for financial performance evaluation, Appl. Soft Comput., 69, pp. 316-329, (2018)
  • [9] Merigo J.M., Palacios-Marques D., Zeng S., Subjective and objective information in linguistic multi-criteria group decision making, European J. Oper. Res., 248, 2, pp. 522-531, (2016)
  • [10] Torra V., Negation functions based semantics for ordered linguistic labels, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 11, 11, pp. 975-988, (1996)