Influence of Sludge Retention Time on the Performance and Stability of Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste with Waste Activated Sludge

被引:0
|
作者
Yuan H.-L. [1 ]
Ma J. [1 ]
Xing B.-S. [1 ]
Wen J.-W. [1 ]
Han Y.-L. [1 ]
Li Q. [1 ]
Wang X.-C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratary of Environmental Engineering, Shaanxi Province, School of Environmental & Municipal Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2019年 / 40卷 / 02期
关键词
Anaerobic co-digestion; Food waste; Methane; Sludge retention time (SRT); Stability; Waste activated sludge;
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.201808114
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two parallel digestion systems of food waste (FW) and waste-activated sludge (WAS) were successfully initiated using a continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR), and the effect of different reduction extents of sludge retention time (SRT) on the co-digestion of FW and WAS was investigated. SRT Reduction extents longer than 8.3 d were not conducive to the stable operation of the co-digestion system when the organic load rate (OLR) was increased. The reduction extent of SRT should be reduced gradually from 5 d to 0.9 d to achieve high load and stable operation of the co-digestion of FW and WAS. After a long-term operation (approximately 282 d), the co-digestion reached stable operation at SRT of 9.1 d and OLR (calculated by COD) of (12.9±1.5) g•(L•d) -1 . The corresponding methane production, methane yield (calculated by COD), pH, and volatile fatty acid (VFA, calculated by COD) were 3.94-4.25 L•(L•d) -1 , 288-302 mL•g -1 , 7.80-7.83, and 0.32-0.39 g•L -1 , respectively. Additionly, the sludge characteristics of the co-digestion of FW and WAS under a high loading rate were also investigated. The results showed that the primary pathway of methane conversion was through acetic acid during the co-digestion of FW and WAS. Meanwhile, higher methanogenic activity of acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, and coenzyme F 420 concentration were also measured. © 2019, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1002
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Zhang C.S., Su H.J., Baeyens J., Et al., Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, pp. 383-392, (2014)
  • [2] Browne J.D., Murphy J.D., Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste, Applied Energy, 104, pp. 170-177, (2013)
  • [3] Ariunbaatar J., Panico A., Frunzo L., Et al., Enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste by thermal and ozonation pretreatment methods, Journal of Environmental Management, 146, pp. 142-149, (2014)
  • [4] Zhang C.S., Su H.J., Tan T.W., Batch and semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of food waste in a dual solid-liquid system, Bioresource Technology, 145, pp. 10-16, (2013)
  • [5] Whiting A., Azapagic A., Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion, Energy, 70, pp. 181-193, (2014)
  • [6] Li Q., Yuwen C.S., Cheng X.R., Et al., Responses of microbial capacity and community on the performance of mesophilic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge in a high-frequency feeding CSTR, Bioresource Technology, 260, pp. 85-94, (2018)
  • [7] Us E., Perendeci N.A., Improvement of methane production from greenhouse residues: optimization of thermal and H <sub>2</sub> SO <sub>4</sub> pretreatment process by experimental design , Chemical Engineering Journal, 181-182, pp. 120-131, (2012)
  • [8] Zhang J.X., Loh K.C., Li W.L., Et al., Three-stage anaerobic digester for food waste, Applied Energy, 194, pp. 287-295, (2017)
  • [9] Zhang J.X., Li W.L., Lee J., Et al., Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge by biological co-pretreatment, Energy, 137, pp. 479-486, (2017)
  • [10] Zahedi S., Icaran P., Yuan Z., Et al., Assessment of free nitrous acid pre-treatment on a mixture of primary sludge and waste activated sludge: effect of exposure time and concentration, Bioresource Technology, 216, pp. 870-875, (2016)