Elucidating the impacts of aerosol radiative effects for mitigating surface O3 and PM 2.5 in Delhi, India during crop residue burning period

被引:0
作者
Chutia, Lakhima [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Jun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Huanxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Garcia, Lorena Castro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Janechek, Nathan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Engn, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Iowa Technol Inst, Coll Engn, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Coll Engn, Global & Reg Environm Res, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
Indian air quality; Crop residue burning; Aerosol radiative effects; Photolysis; O; 3; PM; 2.5; ASIAN MARITIME CONTINENT; AIR-QUALITY; PHOTOLYSIS INTERACTION; PARTICULATE MATTER; TROPOSPHERIC OZONE; ORGANIC AEROSOL; SMOKE TRANSPORT; EMISSION; PM2.5; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120890
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Atmospheric aerosol radiative effects regulate surface air pollution (O3 and PM2.5) via both the aerosol-photolysis effect (APE) and the aerosol-radiation feedback (ARF) on meteorology. Here, we elucidate the roles of APE and ARF on surface O3 and PM 2.5 in the heavily polluted megacity, Delhi, India by using a regional model (WRF-Chem) with constraints from limited surface observations. While APE reduces surface O3 (by 6.1%) and PM 2.5 concentrations (by 2.4% via impeding the secondary aerosol formations), ARF contributes to a 2.5% and 17.5% increase in surface O3 and PM2.5, respectively. The ARF from smoke enhances PM 2.5 (by 8%), black carbon (by 10%), and primary organic aerosol (by 18%) during late autumn when crop residue burning is significant. The synergistic APE and ARF have a negligible impact on the total concentrations of O3 and PM2.5. Hence, the reduction of PM 2.5 may lead to O3 escalation due to weakened APE. Sensitivity experiments indicate the need and effectiveness of reducing VOC emission for the co-benefits of mitigating both O3 and PM 2.5 concentrations in Delhi.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Chemical composition and source attribution of PM2.5 and PM10 in Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR) of India: results from an extensive seasonal campaign
    Bawase, Moqtik
    Sathe, Yogesh
    Khandaskar, Hemant
    Thipse, Sukrut
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 2021, 78 (01) : 35 - 58
  • [2] Surface ozone photolysis rate trends in the Eastern Mediterranean: Modeling the effects of aerosols and total column ozone based on Terra MODIS data
    Benas, N.
    Mourtzanou, E.
    Kouvarakis, G.
    Bais, A.
    Mihalopoulos, N.
    Vardavas, I.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 74 : 1 - 9
  • [3] Modeling of the Effects of Wintertime Aerosols on Boundary Layer Properties Over the Indo Gangetic Plain
    Bharali, Chandrakala
    Nair, Vijayakumar S.
    Chutia, Lakhima
    Babu, S. Suresh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2019, 124 (07) : 4141 - 4157
  • [4] Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions
    Bhuvaneshwari, S.
    Hettiarachchi, Hiroshan
    Meegoda, Jay N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (05)
  • [5] Investigation of PM2.5 mass concentration over India using a regional climate model
    Bran, Sherin Hassan
    Srivastava, Rohit
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 224 : 484 - 493
  • [6] Chou M.-D., 1994, An efficient thermal infrared radiation parameterization for use in general circulation models, DOI DOI 10.1175/JCLI3760.1
  • [7] Distribution of volatile organic compounds over Indian subcontinent during winter: WRF-chem simulation versus observations
    Chutia, Lakhima
    Ojha, Narendra
    Girach, Imran A.
    Sahu, Lokesh K.
    Alvarado, Leonardo M. A.
    Burrows, John P.
    Pathak, Binita
    Bhuyan, Pradip Kumar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 252 : 256 - 269
  • [8] Residential energy use emissions dominate health impacts from exposure to ambient particulate matter in India
    Conibear, Luke
    Butt, Edward W.
    Knote, Christoph
    Arnold, Stephen R.
    Spracklen, Dominick V.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
  • [9] CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board), 2018, Revision-I
  • [10] Crippa M., 2021, EDGAR v5.0 Global Air Pollutant Emissions, V2021