From visions to practice–The role of sensemaking, institutional logic and pragmatic practice

被引:18
作者
Linderoth H.C.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Engineering, Jönköping University, Jönköping
关键词
BIM; implementation; institutional logic; organizational change; sensemaking; telemedicine;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2016.1250930
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The emergence of a new technology like BIM is often connected with extensive discussions of industrial and organizational development and change. However, predicting the use trajectory of a technology has always been a difficult task. In understanding the adoption and use of information and communication technology (ICT), the way that people make sense of a technology is an important component. Even if sensemaking varies over time, studies of sensemaking processes over longer periods are rare. This paper has two aims. First, to develop a conceptual framework of how the development of sensemaking processes shapes the adoption and use of ICT. Second, to discuss the implications of this for research and practice, with a specific focus on the adoption and use of BIM. The research involves a case study of 12 years of telemedicine use in a Swedish county. These results are compared with contemporary BIM studies. The overall conclusion is that the use of technology is heavily shaped by the sensemaking of significant actor groups. This is grounded both an institutional logic and daily practice in relation to the benefits or disadvantages the group perceives from the use of the technology. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 337
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Aranda-Mena G., Et al., Building information modelling demystified: does it make business sense to adopt BIM?, International journal of managing projects in business, 2, pp. 419-434, (2009)
[2]  
Barley S.R., Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments, Administrative science quarterly, 31, 1, pp. 78-108, (1986)
[3]  
Becerik-Gerber B., Rice S., The perceived value of building information modelling in the US building industry, ITcon, 15, pp. 185-201, (2010)
[4]  
Berger T.L., Luckmann T., The social construction of reality, (1967)
[5]  
Bosch P., Et al., Hinder och drivkrafter för BIM i medelstora entreprenadföretag (SBUF-rapport 13069), (2016)
[6]  
Brown A.D., Stacey P., Nandhakumar J., Making sense of sensemaking narratives, Human relations, 61, 8, pp. 1035-1062, (2008)
[7]  
Brynjolfsson E., The productivity paradox of information technology, Communications of the ACM, 36, 12, pp. 66-77, (1993)
[8]  
Cao D., Li H., Wang G., Impacts of Isomorphic Pressures on BIM Adoption in Construction Projects, Journal of construction engineering and management, 140, 12, pp. 04014056-1-04014056-9, (2014)
[9]  
Ciborra C.U., Introduction: What does groupware mean for the organizations hosting it?, Groupware and teamwork, pp. 1-19, (1996)
[10]  
Coffey A., Atkinson P., Making sense of qualitative data, (1996)