Link addition strategy based on complex network theory for power communication network

被引：0

作者：

Liu D. ^{[1
]}

Ji X. ^{[1
]}

Chen G. ^{[2
]}

Wang B. ^{[1
]}

Wei D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of Electrical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan

[2] School of Electrical and Information Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW

来源：

Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment | 2016年 / 36卷 / 10期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Complex network; Connectivity; Electrical power communication network; Link addition strategy; Network efficiency; Vulnerability;

D O I：

10.16081/j.issn.1006-6047.2016.10.018

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Based on the complex network theory, a network model of CCPCN(Central China electrical Power Communication Network) is built and its topological characteristics are analyzed, which shows that CCPCN is a typical scale-free network, being robust to random failures but vulnerable to deliberate attacks, especially the high betweenness node attack. According to the structural features of CCPCN, the impact of link addition strategy on its robustness is compared in the aspects of connectivity and network efficiency among four modes, i.e. random link addition, low degree link addition, low betweenness link addition and algebraic connectivity based link addition. Results show that, the link addition strategy can effectively improve the robustness of CCPCN, and the low betweenness link addition is superior to other three modes in the aspects of protective effect and computing efficiency. © 2016, Electric Power Automation Equipment Press. All right reserved.

引用

页码：121 / 126

页数：5

共 26 条

[1]

Lu X., Wang W., Ma J., An empirical study of communication infrastructures towards the smart grid: design, implementation, and evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4, 1, pp. 170-183, (2013)

[2]

Cao Y., Zhang Y., Bao Z., Analysis of cascading failures under interactions between power grid and communication network, Electric Power Automation Equipment, 33, 1, pp. 7-11, (2013)

[3]

Ancillotti E., Bruno R., Conti M., The role of communication systems in smart grids: architectures, technical solutions and research challenges, Computer Communications, 36, 17-18, pp. 1665-1697, (2013)

[4]

Vespignani A., Complex networks: the fragility of interdependency, Nature, 464, 7291, pp. 984-985, (2010)

[5]

Buldyrev S.V., Parshani R., Paul G., Et al., Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks, Nature, 464, 7291, pp. 1025-1028, (2010)

[6]

Bobbio A., Bonanni G., Ciancamerla E., Et al., Unavailability of critical SCADA communication links interconnecting a power grid and a Telco network, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95, 12, pp. 1345-1357, (2010)

[7]

Zhou J., Lu T., Chen X., Et al., Study on bandwidth analysis and capacity planning of provincial dispatching digital network, Power System Technology, 36, 5, pp. 173-177, (2012)

[8]

Cai W., Yang H., Xiong F., Et al., An optimized service routing allocation method for electric power communication network considering reliability, Power System Technology, 37, 12, pp. 3541-3545, (2013)

[9]

Yuan J., Gao H., Sun Y., Et al., Security evaluation indicator system for electric optical-fiber communication network, High Voltage Engineering, 35, 4, pp. 960-964, (2009)

[10]

Zeng Q., Qiu X., Guo S., Et al., Risk balancing based routing mechanism for power communications service, Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 35, 6, pp. 1318-1324, (2013)

← 1 2 3 →