Estimating the supply of biomass from short-rotation coppice in England, given social, economic and environmental constraints to land availability

被引:0
作者
Aylott M.J. [1 ]
Casella E. [2 ]
Farrall K. [1 ]
Taylor G. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 7PX, Bassett Crescent East
[2] Centre for Forestry and Climate Change, Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey
关键词
Compendex;
D O I
10.4155/bfs.10.30
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Biomass has been identified as an important source of renewable energy. However, growing demand for dedicated energy crops could lead to conflicts with food production and ecosystem services. This study uses a geographic information systems-embedded modeling approach to assess the spatial supply of short-rotation coppice, taking into account social, economic and environmental constraints. Results: Results suggest that 7.5 million tons of biomass (from short-rotation coppice) is realistically available in England. Such production would require 0.8 million ha and could be grown almost entirely on poor quality marginal lands. Conclusion: We therefore conclude that short-rotation coppice energy crops have the potential to play an important role in meeting UK renewable energy targets without compromising environmental sustainability or food production. © 2010 Future Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 727
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Hillier J., Whittaker C., Dailey G., Et al., Greenhouse gas emissions from four bioenergy crops in England and Wales: Integrating spatial estimates of yield and soil carbon balance in life cycle analyses, GCB Bioenergy, 1, 4, pp. 267-281, (2009)
  • [2] St Clair S., Hillier J., Smith P., Estimating the preharvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production, Biomass & Bioenergy, 32, 5, pp. 442-452, (2008)
  • [3] Tucker K., Sage R., Integrated Crop Management of SRC Plantations to Maximize Crop Value, Wildlife Benefits and Other Added Value Opportunities, (1998)
  • [4] Cunningham M.D., Bishop J.D., McKay H.V., Sage R.B., ARBRE Monitoring: Ecology of Short Rotation Coppice, (2004)
  • [5] Parcell J.L., Westhoff P., Economic effects of biofuel production on states and rural communities, J. Agri. App. Econ, 38, 2, pp. 377-387, (2006)
  • [6] Walsh M., De La Torre Ugarte D., Shapouri H., Slinsky S., Bioenergy crop production in the United States: Potential quantities, land use changes, and economic impacts on the agricultural sector, Environ. Res. Econ, 24, 4, pp. 313-333, (2003)
  • [7] Turley D.B., Boatman N.D., Ceddia G., Barker D., Watola G., Liquid Biofuels - Prospects and Potential Impacts on UK Agriculture, the Farmed Environment, Landscape and Rural Economy, (2002)
  • [8] Sims R.E.H., Bioenergy to mitigate forclimate change and meet the needs of society, the economy and the environment, Mitig. Adapt. Strat/Global Chan, 8, 4, pp. 349-370, (2003)
  • [9] Gallagher E., The Gallagher Review of the Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production, (2008)
  • [10] Mitchell D., A Note on Rising Food Prices: Policy Research, (2008)