Finite Element Analysis: Connector Designs and Pontic Stress Distribution of Fixed Partial Denture Implant-Supported Metal Framework

被引:2
作者
Muhsin S.A. [1 ]
Mohammed E.K. [2 ]
Bander K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle Technical University, College of Health and Medical Techniques, Baghdad
[2] Middle Technical University, Institute of Medical Technology, Baghdad
关键词
connector designs; FEA; implant-supported; metal framework; pontic; stress distribution;
D O I
10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2023048378
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This virtual study was designed to evaluate the stress-deformation of a metal fixed partial dentures (FPDs) pontic under different loads using two different connectors. The STL file was generated for a RPD of two implant-supported restorations. The Co–Cr metal substructure was designed with two types of connector design. The pontic is connected to implant-supported crowns with square and round shape connectors. This study was designed for a cementless-retained implant-supported FPD. Finite element modeling (FEM) is used to assess the stress and deformation of the pontic within a metal substructure as the FEM might provide virtual values that could have laboratory and clinical relevance. The Co–Cr alloy mechanical properties like the Poisson ratio and modulus of elasticity were based on the parameters of the three-dimensional structure additive method. Nonparametric analyses (Mann-Whitney U test) was used. The use of square or round connectors often resulted in non-significant changes in stress, and deformation under either three or each loaded point on the occlusal surface of a pontic (P > 0.05). However, the deformation revealed distinct variations between loads of the three points compared to each loaded point (P ≤ 0.05). According to this study data, the pontic occlusal surface appears to be the same in stress and deformation under different loads depending on whether square or round connectors are used. While at the same connector designs, the pontic occlusal surface deformed significantly at three loaded points than it did at each point. © 2024 by Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 47
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Makhija SK, Lawson NC, Gilbert GH, Litaker MS, McClelland JA, Louis DR, Gordan VV, Pihlstrom DJ, Meyerowitz C, Mungia R, McCracken MS., Dentist material selection for single-unit crowns: Findings from the national dental practice-based research network, J Dent, 55, pp. 40-47, (2016)
[2]  
Haider Y, Dimashkieh M, Rayyan M., Survey of dental materials used by dentists for indirect restorations in Saudi Arabia, Int J Phrosthodont, 30, 1, pp. 80-85, (2017)
[3]  
Naumova EA, Roth F, Baulig C, Arnold WH, Piwowarczyk A., Influence of luting materials on the retention of cemented implant-supported crowns, ECMS 2018, (2018)
[4]  
Roberts HW, Berzins DW, Moore BK, Charlton DG., Metal-ceramic alloys in dentistry: A review, J Prosthodont, 18, 2, pp. 188-194, (2009)
[5]  
Al-Yahyaee KH, Rehman MU, Al-Jarrah IMW, Mensi W, Vo XV., Co-movements and spillovers between prices of precious metals and non-ferrous metals: A multiscale analysis, Resour Policy, 67, (2020)
[6]  
Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, von Steyern PV., The fit of cobalt–chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: A comparative in vitro study, Dent Mater, 27, 4, pp. 356-363, (2011)
[7]  
Barazanchi A, Li KC, Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Waddell JN., Additive technology: Update on current materials and applications in dentistry, J Prosthodont, 26, 2, pp. 156-163, (2017)
[8]  
Selvaraj SK, Prasad SK, Yasin SY, Subhash US, Verma PS, Manikandan M, Dev SJ., Additive manufacturing of dental material parts via laser melting deposition: A review, technical issues, and future research directions, J Manuf Process, 76, pp. 67-78, (2022)
[9]  
Kim J-H, Kwon J-S, Park J-M, Russo LL, Shim J-S., Effects of postpolymerization conditions on the physical properties, cytotoxicity, and dimensional accuracy of a 3D-printed dental restorative material, J Prosthet Dent, (2022)
[10]  
Ellakany P, Aly NM, Al-Harbi F., Accuracy of 3D printed and digital casts produced from intraoral and extraoral scanners with different scanning technologies: In vitro study, J Prosthodont, 31, 6, pp. 521-528, (2022)