Quantitative Analysis of Risk Reduction of Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline with Explosion Proof Wall

被引：0

作者：

Chen P. ^{[1
]}

Chen G. ^{[1
]}

Qi S. ^{[1
]}

Zhou Z. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Institute of Safety Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, Guangdong

来源：

Chen, Guohua (mmghchen@scut.edu.cn) | 2018年 / South China University of Technology卷 / 46期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Explosion proof wall; Long distance transportation pipeline; Natural gas; Rate of reduction; Risk assessment;

D O I：

10.3969/j.issn.1000-565X.2018.02.018

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The control function of safety-prevention measures and the effect of mitigating safety measures on reduction of accident consequences are seldom considered in the analysis assessment of a general long-distance natural gas pipeline risk. A method that can quantify the effect of the explosion proof wall in quantitative risk analysis of a long-distance natural gas pipeline is proposed. Firstly, the attenuation rate calculation formula of the explosion proof wall resisting explosion shock wave overpressure of a long-distance natural gas pipeline is defined, and then the method to solve the attenuation of shock wave overpressure in a sensitive target area after the explosion proof wall is used. Finally, through correcting the accident parameter value based on the energy equivalent principle, an analysis is performed of the risk reduction level of a sensitive target area surrounding pipeline after the explosion proof wall was constructed. The case study suggests that the average rate of reduction of shock wave overpressure in sensitive target area after the explosion proof wall about 50.05% was constructed; the individual and the social risk is reduced to an acceptable level. The quantitative characterization method of safety measures in quantitative risk assessment can provide technical reference for the construction of safety facilities in the surrounding area of a long-distance natural gas pipeline. © 2018, Editorial Department, Journal of South China University of Technology. All right reserved.

引用

页码：124 / 130

页数：6

共 14 条

[1]

Li X.-Y., Wang C.-Y., Liu Y.-W., Et al., Competition situation of China's natural gas industry during the 13th Five-Year Plan and the corresponding countermeasures, Natural Gas Industry, 36, 2, pp. 119-124, (2016)

[2]

Gas pipeline incidents-9th report of the European gas pipeline incident data group, pp. 11-55, (2015)

[3]

Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, pp. 395-452, (2000)

[4]

Keeley D., Turner S., Harper P., Management of the UK HSE failure rate and event data, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24, 3, pp. 237-241, (2011)

[5]

Risk-based Inspection Base Resource Document: API 581

[6]

Zhu Y., Qian X.M., Liu Z.Y., Et al., Analysis and assessment of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident: Lessons learnt, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 33, pp. 289-303, (2015)

[7]

Zhao D.-F., Chen S., Zhao Z.-Q., Et al., Study on oil-gas pipeline risk assessment method based on vulnerability and its application, China Safety Science Journal, 24, 7, pp. 57-62, (2014)

[8]

Willauer H.D., Ananth R., Farley J.P., Et al., Mitigation of TNT and Destex explosion effects using water mist, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 165, 1-3, pp. 1068-1073, (2008)

[9]

Mao Y.-M., Fang Q., Zhang Y.-D., Et al., Comparison investigation on mitigation effect of water and concrete explosion-proof walls, Acta Armamentarii, pp. 84-89, (2009)

[10]

Zhang Y., Nian X.-Z., Yan D.-J., Et al., Mitigation effects of explosion-proof water walls and explosion-proof concrete walls on blase shock wave, Journal of Vibration & Shock, 33, 18, pp. 214-220, (2014)

← 1 2 →