Information-theoretic lower bounds for compressive sensing with generative models

被引:18
作者
Liu Z. [1 ,2 ]
Scarlett J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] The Department of Computer Science, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore
[2] The Department of Computer Science, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore
[3] The Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore
来源
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory | 2020年 / 1卷 / 01期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Compressive sensing; Generative models; Information-theoretic limits; Neural networks; Sparsity;
D O I
10.1109/JSAIT.2020.2980676
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It has recently been shown that for compressive sensing, significantly fewer measurements may be required if the sparsity assumption is replaced by the assumption the unknown vector lies near the range of a suitably-chosen generative model. In particular, in (Bora et al., 2017) it was shown roughly O(k log L) random Gaussian measurements suffice for accurate recovery when the generative model is an L-Lipschitz function with bounded k-dimensional inputs, and O(kd log w) measurements suffice when the generative model is a k-input ReLU network with depth d and width w. In this paper, we establish corresponding algorithm-independent lower bounds on the sample complexity using tools from minimax statistical analysis. In accordance with the above upper bounds, our results are summarized as follows: (i) We construct an L-Lipschitz generative model capable of generating group-sparse signals, and show that the resulting necessary number of measurements is Ω(k log L); (ii) Using similar ideas, we construct ReLU networks with high depth and/or high depth for which the necessary number of measurements scales as Ω(kd loglogwn ) (with output dimension n), and in some cases Ω(kd log w). As a result, we establish that the scaling laws derived in (Bora et al., 2017) are optimal or near-optimal in the absence of further assumptions. © 2020 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 303
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Foucart S., Rauhut H., A Mathematical Introduction to Compressive Sensing, (2013)
  • [2] Wainwright M.J., High-Dimensional Statistics: A Non-Asymptotic Viewpoint, 48, (2019)
  • [3] Tropp J.A., Just relax: Convex programming methods for identifying sparse signals in noise, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 52, 3, pp. 1030-1051, (2006)
  • [4] Wainwright M., Sharp thresholds for high-dimensional and noisy sparsity recovery using l<sub>1</sub>-constrained quadratic programming (Lasso), IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 55, 5, pp. 2183-2202, (2009)
  • [5] Tropp J.A., Greed is good: Algorithmic results for sparse approximation, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 50, 10, pp. 2231-2242, (2004)
  • [6] Wen J., Zhou Z., Wang J., Tang X., Mo Q., A sharp condition for exact support recovery with orthogonal matching pursuit, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 65, 6, pp. 1370-1382, (2016)
  • [7] Donoho D.L., Javanmard A., Montanari A., Information-theoretically optimal compressed sensing via spatial coupling and approximate message passing, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 59, 11, pp. 7434-7464, (2013)
  • [8] Amelunxen D., Lotz M., McCoy M.B., Tropp J.A., Living on the edge: Phase transitions in convex programs with random data, Inf. Infer., 3, 3, pp. 224-294, (2014)
  • [9] Wainwright M., Information-theoretic limits on sparsity recovery in the high-dimensional and noisy setting, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 55, 12, pp. 5728-5741, (2009)
  • [10] Arias-Castro E., Candes E.J., Davenport M.A., On the fundamental limits of adaptive sensing, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 59, 1, pp. 472-481, (2013)