Representing metadata constraints in Common Logic

被引：0
作者：
Computer Science Department, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, United States [1 ]
机构：
[1] Computer Science Department, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville
来源：
Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontol. | 2009年 / 4卷 / 277-286期
关键词：
Common Logic; Constraints; Metadata; Standards;
D O I：
10.1504/IJMSO.2009.029231
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This paper presents a standards-based approach to specifying and reasoning about metadata constraints based on existing metadata registry standards, existing terminologies and Common Logic. The paper introduces Common Logic's basic principles and theory, and applies it to several examples where we might want to reason about metadata constraints. It is our expectation that these additional constraints will be developed by the makers of the metadata for a given data source, and will be included in a metadata registry for exchange with any subscriber to the metadata. Copyright © 2009, Inderscience Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码：277 / 286
页数：9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Antoniou G., van Harmelen F., Web Ontology Language: OWL, Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 67-92, (2004)
  • [2] Arens Y., Knoblock C.A., Shen W.-M., Query reformulation for dynamic information integration, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 6, pp. 99-130, (1996)
  • [3] Baader F., Horrocks I., Sattler U., Description logics, Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 3-28, (2004)
  • [4] Bertino E., Zarri G.P., Catania B., Intelligent Database Systems, (2001)
  • [5] Booch G., Rumbaugh J., Jacobsen I., Unified Modeling Language User Guide (2/e), (2005)
  • [6] Brachman R.J., Levesque H.J., Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, (2004)
  • [7] Brickley D., Guha R.V., RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema, (2004)
  • [8] Common Logic Standard portal
  • [9] Coronado S.D., Haber M.W., Sioutos N., Tuttle M.S., Wright L.W., NCI thesaurus: Using science-based terminology to integrate cancer research results, Proceedings of 11th World Congress on Medical Informatics, pp. 33-37, (2004)
  • [10] Delugach H.S., Analyzing multiple views of software requirements, Conceptual Structures: Current Research and Practice, pp. 391-410, (1992)
1234