Evaluation Model of Telemedicine Service Quality Based on Machine Sensing Vision

被引:0
作者
Cao Y. [1 ]
Li H. [1 ]
Zeqi X. [2 ]
Cui Z. [1 ]
Ambati L.S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sias University, School of Nursing, Henan, Xinzheng
[2] Sias University, School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Henan, Xinzheng
[3] Indiana University, Kokomo, IN
关键词
Evaluation index system; Machine sensing vision technology; Language information assessment; Subjective and objective combination weighting method; Telemedicine service quality assessment;
D O I
10.4108/EETPHT.V8I3.669
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: At present, the common telemedicine service quality evaluation methods can not obtain the key evaluation indicators, which leads to the low accuracy and low user satisfaction. OBJECTIVES: This paper constructs a telemedicine service quality evaluation model based on machine vision technology. METHODS: Machine vision technology is used to obtain telemedicine service information, preliminarily select service quality assessment indicators, complete the selection of indicators, build a telemedicine service quality assessment indicator system, adopt subjective and objective combination method to calculate the weight of service quality assessment indicators, and combine matter element analysis method to build a telemedicine service quality assessment model. RESULTS: The experimental results show that the Cronhach a is higher than 0.7, the Barthel index is higher than 90, and the satisfaction of many users is more than 90%. CONCLUSION: The proposed method solves the problems existing in the current method and lays a foundation for the development of telemedicine service technology. © 2022 Loknath Sai Ambati et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Bojja G R, Liu J., Impact of it investment on hospital performance: a longitudinal data analysis[C], Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, (2020)
  • [2] Brown E M, O'Brien J, Popelka J, Et al., 104. Telemedicine for Teens: Can We Confidently Deliver Effective and Equitable Care?[J], Journal of Adolescent Health, 68, 2, (2021)
  • [3] Shabaan M, Arshid K, Yaqub M, Et al., Survey: smartphone-based assessment of cardiovascular diseases using ECG and PPG analysis[J], BMC medical informatics and decision making, 20, 1, pp. 1-16, (2020)
  • [4] Syawaludin M F, Lee M, Hwang J I., Foveation Pipeline for 360° Video-Based Telemedicine[J], Sensors, 20, 8, (2020)
  • [5] Li Q J, Yan J, Zhang Z L, Et al., Empirical Study on Core Evaluation Index System of Inpatient Healthcare Service Quality with Value-Based Healthcare[J], Chinese Health Economics, 39, pp. 79-80, (2020)
  • [6] Shi X E, Wang B X, Fang Y Q, Et al., Comprehensive Evaluation of Rehabilitation Medical Service Quality in Tertiary General Hospitals in Gansu,China[J], Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 27, pp. 117-124, (2021)
  • [7] Deng J, Hu M Y., Research on Quality Evaluation System of Online Medical Community Information Service from the Perspective of User Perception[J], Information Studies:Theory & Application, 42, 10, pp. 91-96, (2019)
  • [8] Rafique O, Mir A H., Weighted dimensionality reduction and robust Gaussian mixture model based cancer patient subtyping from gene expression data[J], Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 112, (2020)
  • [9] Liu S, Xu X, Zhang Y, Et al., A Reliable Sample Selection Strategy for Weakly-supervised Visual Tracking[J], IEEE Transactions on Reliability, (2022)
  • [10] Bojja G R, Liu J, Ambati L S., Health Information systems capabilities and Hospital performance–An SEM analysis[C], AMCIS, (2021)