Librarians as part of cross-disciplinary, multi-institutional team projects: Experiences from the VIVO collaboration

被引：3

作者：

Basic Biomedical Sciences, Biomedical and Health Information Services Department, University of Florida Health Sciences Center Library, P.O. Box 100206, Gainesville, FL 32610-0206, United States ^{[1
]}

不详 ^{[2
]}

不详 ^{[3
]}

不详 ^{[4
]}

不详 ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Basic Biomedical Sciences, Biomedical and Health Information Services Department, University of Florida Health Sciences Center Library, Gainesville, FL 32610-0206

[2] Robert Marston Science Library, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

[3] Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

[4] Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, St. Louis, MO

[5] University of Florida Genetics Institute, Gainesville, FL

来源：

García-Milian, R. (rolando.milian@ufl.edu) | 1600年 / Routledge卷 / 32期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

collaboration; interdisciplinary; team science;

D O I：

10.1080/0194262X.2013.791183

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Cross-disciplinary, team-based collaboration is essential for addressing today's complex research questions, and librarians are increasingly entering into such collaborations. This study identifies skills needed as librarians integrate into cross-disciplinary teams, based on the experiences of librarians involved in the development and implementation of VIVO, a research discovery and collaboration platform. Participants discussed the challenges, skills gained, and lessons learned throughout the project. Their responses were analyzed in the light of the science of team science literature, and factors affecting collaboration on the VIVO team were identified. Skills in inclusive thinking, communication, perseverance, adaptability, and leadership were found to be essential. © 2013 Published with license by Taylor & Francis.

引用

页码：160 / 175

页数：15

共 33 条

[1]

Aitken E., Powelson S.E., Reaume R.D., Ghali W.A., Involving clinical librarians at the point of care: Results of a controlled intervention, Academic Medicine, 86, 12, pp. 1508-1512, (2011)

[2]

Bandy M., Condon J., Graves E., Participating in communities of practice, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 27, 4, pp. 441-419, (2008)

[3]

Bennett M.L., Gadlin H., Levine-Findley S., Team Science and Collaboration: A Field Guide, (2010)

[4]

Borner K., Contractor N., Falk-Krzesinski H.J., Fiore S.M., Hall K.L., Keyton J., Spring B., Stokols D., Trochim W., Uzzi B., A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science, Science Translational Medicine, 15, 2, pp. 49-24, (2010)

[5]

Burke C.S., Stagl K.C., Salas E., Pierce L., Kendall D., Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 6, pp. 1189-1207, (2006)

[6]

Cummings J.N., Kiesler S., Who collaborates successfully? Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research, Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 437-446, (2008)

[7]

Davis V., Devare M., Russell Gonzalez S., Tennant M.R., Implementation of A New Research Discovery Tool by the University Libraries at Cornell University and the University of Florida, (2009)

[8]

Disis M.L., Slattery J.T., The road we must take: Multidisciplinary team science, Science Translational Medicine, 2, 22, pp. 22-9, (2010)

[9]

Dudden R.F., Protzko S.L., The systematic review team: Contributions of the health sciences librarian, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 30, 3, pp. 301-315, (2011)

[10]

Fiore S.M., Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: How the science of teams can inform team science, Small Group Research, 39, 3, pp. 251-277, (2008)

← 1 2 3 4 →