Relationship between Governance Development Models and Operational Efficiency of Urban Rail Transit

被引:0
作者
Zhang J.-H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing
[2] Air Force Engineering Design and Research Institute of PLA, Beijing
来源
Jiaotong Yunshu Xitong Gongcheng Yu Xinxi/Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology | 2017年 / 17卷 / 05期
关键词
Corporatization; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Operational efficiency; Public-Private Partnership (PPP); Social benefit; Urban rail transit; Urban traffic;
D O I
10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2017.05.003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Influenced by the rapid development of a new type urbanization path which is intensive, smart, green and low-carbon, many cities in China are striving to develop urban rail transit systems (URTS). It is critical that URTS are concerned with their operational efficiency and the governance development models within which they are developed have a profound impact upon their process of operation. This paper outlines the corporatization model and the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) within which URTS in many cities in China are developed. In the analysis of operational efficiency, the social benefits of URTS are involved, the calculation models of URTS social benefits are presented. The relationship between governance development models and operational efficiency of several urban rail transit lines is analyzed through the application of data envelopment analysis (DEA). By the comparative analysis of operational efficiency of several urban rail transit lines in Beijing, it indicates that, the social benefit is an important indicator to evaluate the operational efficiency of URTS; comparing with the corporatization model which has been predominant in China, PPP has a positive impact upon the improvement of operational efficiency. Copyright © 2017 by Science Press.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 21and35
页数:2119
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Jain P., Cullinane S., Cullinane K., The impact of governance development models on urban rail efficiency, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42, 9, pp. 1238-1250, (2008)
[2]  
Liu Z.G., Wu Q., He J., Et al., Study on efficiency of urban rail transit based on DEA, Railway Transport and Economy, 30, 4, pp. 61-64, (2008)
[3]  
Song Y., Lv C., An empirical study of evaluation of urban rail transit operation efficiency in China, Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies for Rail Transportation (EITRT2013), 1, pp. 535-543, (2014)
[4]  
Zhou Q., Qin F.F., Wu G., Study on efficiency evaluation of urban rail transit system based on DEA, Railway Transport and Economy, 36, 2, pp. 79-83, (2014)
[5]  
Schrank D., Lomax T., Eisele B., 2011 Annual Urban Mobility Report, (2011)
[6]  
Commuter rail: serving America's emerging suburban/urban economy, (1997)
[7]  
Chen S.X., Tao X.M., Estimative analysis of the social benefit of Shanghai UMT system, Urban Mass Transit, 7, 1, pp. 1-5, (2004)
[8]  
Zhang Q.J., The analysis on cost of urban rail transit-with example of Beijing Subway Line 4, (2010)
[9]  
Zhang T.Y., Study on different urban transport modes' energy consumption, (2010)
[10]  
Tong Q., Zhang J., A study on the subsidy amount of Beijing urban rail transit based on the externalities, Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 10, 2, pp. 40-46, (2011)