The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance

被引:6
作者
Mardani A. [1 ]
Nikoosokhan S. [2 ]
Moradi M. [2 ]
Doustar M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Jalal-al-Ahmed, Tehran
[2] Department of Management, University of Guilan, Rasht-Tehran Road, Rasht
关键词
Innovation Performance; Knowledge Creation; Knowledge Integration; Knowledge Management;
D O I
10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.002
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the quantitative relationship between knowledge management, innovation, and performance. We aim to shed some light on the consequences of Knowledge Management (KM) activities on firm's innovation and performance. Organizations are unaware of real implications of KM. According to the literature review, we develop a research model showing a positive relationship between knowledge management, and performance as well as its impact on innovation, which in turn contributes to the firm's performance. Using data from 120 firms that are members of the Iranian Power Syndicate, this model was tested empirically. Based on the Structural Equation Model (SEM) results by Partial Least Square (PLS) method, research hypotheses were supported. Results show that KM activities impact innovation and organizational performance directly, and indirectly through an increase in innovation capability. It is found that knowledge creation, knowledge integration, and knowledge application facilitate innovation and performance. Knowledge creation has more significant effects on innovation speed, innovation quality, and innovation quantity, whereas innovation quality, knowledge creation, and knowledge integration has more significant effects on performance. Findings presented in this paper may help academics and managers in designing KM programs to achieve higher innovation, effectiveness, efficiency, and profitability. © 2018 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 26
页数:14
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]  
Adamides E.D., Karacapilidis N., Information technology support for the knowledge and social processes of innovation management, Technovation, 26, pp. 50-59, (2006)
[2]  
Alavi M., Leidner D.E., Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly, 25, pp. 107-136, (2001)
[3]  
Allocca M.A., Kessler E.H., Innovation speed in small and medium sized enterprises, Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, pp. 279-295, (2006)
[4]  
Argote L., Ingram P., Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, pp. 150-169, (2000)
[5]  
Bilton C., Cummings S., Creative strategy: From innovation to sustainable advantage, (2009)
[6]  
Borghini S., Organizational creativity: Breaking equilibrium and order to innovate, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 4, pp. 19-33, (2005)
[7]  
Boyd J.L., Bresser R.K., Performance implications of delayed competitive responses: Evidence from the US retail industry, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 10, pp. 1077-1096, (2008)
[8]  
Brentani U., Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, pp. 169-187, (2001)
[9]  
Brockman B.K., Morgan R.M., The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance, Decision Sciences, 34, pp. 385-419, (2003)
[10]  
Brown J.S., Duguid P., Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation, Organization Science, 2, pp. 40-57, (1991)