A systematic review of research on biodiversity in Japanese retarding basins.

被引：0

作者：

Tawa K. ^{[1
]}

Nishihiro J. ^{[1
]}

Sakai M. ^{[2
]}

Takeda T. ^{[2
]}

Hayashi S. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Center for Climate Change Adaptation, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2, Onogawa, Ibaraki, Tsukuba

[2] Fukushima Regional Collaborative Research Center, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 10-2, Fukasaku, Miharu, Tamura District, Fukushima

来源：

Ecology and Civil Engineering | 2024年 / 26卷 / 02期

基金：

日本学术振兴会;

关键词：

flood control; flood disturbance; floodplain; systematic review; wetland;

D O I：

10.3825/ECE.23-00011

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

We conducted a systematic review of literatures on biodiversity in retarding basins to grasp the status of knowledge regarding effects of constructions and managements of them on biodiversity. Six taxonomic groups(birds, amphibians, fish, insects, shellfish, and plants) were included in the review to examine multi-taxonomic responses. Totally 9,183 literatures were reviewed, and 242 were selected for this systematic review. The total number of sites in the selected literature was 33, which cover only 22 ％ of the number of retarding basins in Japan. Birds were reported most frequently(94) whereas amphibians were most scarce(6). For all the taxa, reports on the occurrence of rare species or invasive species, and new record of species distribution, were common. Only 15 studies were based on the BACI design, suggesting a lack of scientific knowledge regarding biodiversity assessments in retarding basins. Thus, we could not fully clarify the effects of retarding basins on biodiversity. However, some studies suggested that the artificial disturbances, wetland creation, vegetation management, and soil excavation, had positive effects on many taxa. © 2024 Ecology and Civil Engineering Society. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：55 / 69

页数：14

共 68 条

[1]

Adams M.J., Pearl C.A, Problems and opportunities managing invasive bullfrogs: is there any hope?, Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution, and threats, pp. 679-693, (2007)

[2]

pp. 212-215

[3]

Christie A.P., Amano T., Martin P. A., Shackelford G.E., Simmons B.I., Sutherland W.J, Simple study designs in ecology produce inaccurate estimates of biodiversity responses, Journal of Applied Ecology, 56, pp. 2742-2754, (2019)

[4]

Donaldson M.R., Burnett N.J., Braun D.C., Suski C.D., Hinch S.G., Cooke S.J., Kerr J.T, Taxonomic bias and international biodiversity conservation research, Facets, 1, pp. 105-113, (2016)

[5]

Drucker A.M., Fleming P., Chan A.W, Research techniques made simple: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews, Journal of Investigative Dermatolog, 136, pp. e109-e114, (2016)

[6]

湿地研究, 9, pp. 29-37

[7]

魚類学雑誌, 68, pp. 61-66

[8]

Godin K., Stapleton J., Kirkpatrick S.I., Hanning R.M., Leatherdale S.T, Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada, Systematic reviews, 4, pp. 1-10, (2015)

[9]

Haddaway N.R., Watson M.J, On the benefits of systematic reviews for wildlife parasitology, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife, 5, pp. 184-191, (2016)

[10]

河川技術論文集, 18, pp. 29-34

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →