An overview on evaluating and predicting scholarly article impact

被引:38
作者
Bai X. [1 ,2 ]
Liu H. [1 ]
Zhang F. [3 ]
Ning Z. [1 ]
Kong X. [1 ]
Lee I. [4 ]
Xia F. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian
[2] Computing Center, Anshan Normal University, Anshan
[3] Library, Anshan Normal University, Anshan
[4] School of Information Technology and Mathematical Sciences, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, 5095, SA
关键词
Article impact; Data mining; Machine learning; Scholarly big data;
D O I
10.3390/info8030073
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Scholarly article impact reflects the significance of academic output recognised by academic peers, and it often plays a crucial role in assessing the scientific achievements of researchers, teams, institutions and countries. It is also used for addressing various needs in the academic and scientific arena, such as recruitment decisions, promotions, and funding allocations. This article provides a comprehensive review of recent progresses related to article impact assessment and prediction. The review starts by sharing some insight into the article impact research and outlines current research status. Some core methods and recent progress are presented to outline how article impact metrics and prediction have evolved to consider integrating multiple networks. Key techniques, including statistical analysis, machine learning, data mining and network science, are discussed. In particular, we highlight important applications of each technique in article impact research. Subsequently, we discuss the open issues and challenges of article impact research. At the same time, this review points out some important research directions, including article impact evaluation by considering Conflict of Interest, time and location information, various distributions of scholarly entities, and rising stars. © 2017 by the authors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Aguinis H., Suarez-Gonzalez I., Lannelongue G., Joo H., Scholarly impact revisited, Acad. Manag. Perspect, 26, pp. 105-132, (2012)
[2]  
Gargouri Y., Hajjem C., Lariviere V., Gingras Y., Carr L., Brody T., Harnad S., Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research, PLoS ONE, 5, (2010)
[3]  
Wang D., Song C., Barabasi A.L., Quantifying long-term scientific impact, Science, 342, pp. 127-132, (2013)
[4]  
Piwowar H., Altmetrics: Value all research products, Nature, 493, (2013)
[5]  
Chen P., Xie H., Maslov S., Redner S., Finding scientific gems with Google's PageRank algorithm, J. Informetr, 1, pp. 8-15, (2007)
[6]  
Jordan M., Mitchell T., Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects, Science, 349, pp. 255-260, (2015)
[7]  
Johnson R.A., Wichern D.W., Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 5, (2002)
[8]  
Di Ciaccio A., Coli M., Ibanez J.M.A., Advanced Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Large Data-Sets, (2012)
[9]  
Bai X., Xia F., Lee I., Zhang J., Ning Z., Identifying anomalous citations for objective evaluation of scholarly article impact, PLoS ONE, 11, (2016)
[10]  
Costas R., Zahedi Z., Wouters P., Do 'altmetrics' correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol, 66, pp. 2003-2019, (2015)