Study on constitutive model of austenitic stainless steel and duplex stainless steel under cyclic loading

被引：0
|
作者：
Chang X. [1 ]
Yang L. [1 ]
Wang M. [2 ]
Yin F. [1 ]
机构：
[1] The College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing
[2] School of civil engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing
来源：
Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics | 2019年 / 36卷 / 05期
关键词：
Austenitic stainless steel; Cyclic loading; Duplex stainless steel; Finite element method (FEM); Hysteretic constitutive model; Skeleton curve;
D O I：
10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.03.0184
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to study the constitutive relation of stainless steel under cyclic loading, austenitic stainless steel S30408 and duplex stainless steel S220503 coupons were tested under monotonic and large-strain ultra-low cyclic loading. Three types of constitutive models were used to fit the stress-strain relationship under monotonic loading, and pertinent constitutive relation parameters were obtained. The cyclic skeleton curves were fitted by the Ramberg-Osgood model, and the parameters of the cyclic hardening were calculated. Furthermore, the parameters of the cyclic constitutive model were calibrated and the test curves were simulated by ABAQUS finite element analysis software. The results show that the G-R-O constitutive model can fit the constitutive relation better under monotonic loading. Under cyclic loading, with the increase of cyclic loops and change in strain amplitudes, stainless steel exhibits a cyclic hardening behavior. The Ramberg-Osgood model fit the skeleton curve well and the simulated curves agree fairly well with the test curves. Therefore, the hardening parameters and cyclic constitutive parameters which calibrated by the test data can be applied to the structural seismic analysis, and improve the accuracy of analysis for the stainless steel structure under earthquake. © 2019, Engineering Mechanics Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：137 / 147
页数：10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Gardner L., Nethercot D.A., Experiments on stainless steel hollow sections-Part 1: Material and cross-sectional behavior, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60, 9, pp. 1291-1318, (2004)
  • [22] Quach W.M., Teng J.G., Chung K.F., Three-stage full-range stress-strain model for stainless steels, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 134, 9, pp. 1518-1527, (2008)
  • [23] Nathaniel G.C., Krawinkler H., Uniaxial cyclic stress-strain behavior of structural steel, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 111, 9, pp. 1105-1120, (1985)
  • [24] Chaboche J.L., Time independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity, International Journal of Plasticity, 2, 2, pp. 149-188, (1986)
  • [25] Wang M., Yang W., Austenitic stainless steel hysteretic constitutive model, Journal of Architectural Materials, 11, pp. 107-114, (2015)
  • [26] Wang Y., Chang T., Experimental study on constitutive relation of austenitic stainless steel under cyclic loading, Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 42, 6, pp. 1175-1179, (2012)
  • [27] Nip K.H., Gardner L., Et al., Extremely low cycle fatigue tests on structural carbon steel and stainless steel, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66, 1, pp. 96-110, (2010)
  • [28] Duan W., Deng Z., Et al., The constitutive model test of stainless steel S30408 materials study, Steel Structure, 31, 5, pp. 37-40, (2016)
  • [29] Chaboche J.L., Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity, International Journal of Plasticity, 2, 2, pp. 149-188, (1986)
  • [30] GB/T 228.1-2010, metal material tensile test Part 1: room temperature test method, (2010)
1234