Automatic measurement method of drilling-cuttings of boreholes in the coal seam and test study

被引:0
作者
Yin Y. [1 ]
Zheng W. [1 ]
Zhao T. [1 ]
Ren W. [2 ]
Zhang W. [3 ]
Zhao Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao
[2] Shandong Energy Group Luxi Mining Co., Ltd., Heze
[3] Shandong Tangkou Coal Co., Ltd., Jining
来源
Meitan Kexue Jishu/Coal Science and Technology (Peking) | 2023年 / 51卷 / 11期
关键词
coal bump; drilling-cuttings method; large-diameter borehole; measurement method; quality of drilling-cuttings;
D O I
10.12438/cst.2022-2006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drilling-cutting method is a commonly used coal bump risk detection method in coal seams. The efficient and accurate acquisition of the quality of drilling-cuttings is a technical difficulty in engineering site, which could directly affect the risk detection efficiency and results. Based on the discharging characteristics of drilling-cuttings and the principle of fluid quality weighing, an automatic measuring device for drilling-cuttings suitable for different diameter boreholes is developed. This device consists of cuttings collecting unit, weighing unit, data processing system and fixing unit. It can measure the quality of the drilling-cuttings according to the flow-quality of drilling-cuttings discharged from the borehole and the calibration function. The measurement accuracy of this method is verified by laboratory test and field test. Research shows that the drilling process and drilling pipe installation process can be easily identified based on the drilling cuttings’ flow quality – time curve. The accumulated flow-quality of drilling-cuttings per meter has positive linear correlation with its actual quality, and the calibration function is related to the device measurement parameters, such as the dip angel of the weighing slideway and the sampling frequency. Compared with the conventional weighing method, when measuring the drilling-cuttings by using the automatic measurement device, the maximum measurement error of the laboratory test is less than 6.5%, and the average error of the field test is 5.13%, while the data with error less than 10% account for 86.91%. The device measure parameters and the engineering factors, such as drilling-cuttings flow velocity and particle size, have little effect on the measurement accuracy. In the construction of conventional-diameter drilling-cutting borehole, the drilling pipe installation process time is reduced by 25.16%, and the construction efficiency is increased by 11.84%. The distribution law of drilling-cuttings in the shallow part of the large-diameter destressing borehole is consistent with that of the conventional-diameter drilling-cutting borehole, and the distribution of drilling-cuttings in deeper roadway side can be obtained. The proposed automatic measurement method of drilling-cuttings can improve the construction operability of large-diameter drilling-cutting method, and can realize the synchronous operation of pressure relief and drilling-cuttings measurement. © 2023 Coal Science and Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 32
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]  
JIANG Yaodong, ZHAO Yixin, State of the art: investigation on mechanism, forecast and control of coal bumps in China[J], Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 34, 11, pp. 2188-2204, (2015)
[12]  
QI Qingxin, LI Yizhe, ZHAO Shankun, Et al., Seventy years development of coal mine rockburst in China: establishment and consideration of theory and technology system[J], Coal Science and Technology, 47, 9, pp. 1-40, (2019)
[13]  
Wenjun JU, UN Liuwei,IU Shaohong, Et al., Idea and implementation of “stress relief-support reinforcement”cooperative control in rockburst roadway[J], Coal Science and Technology, 49, 4, pp. 90-94, (2021)
[14]  
GB/T 25217.6—2019, Methods for test, monitoring and prevention of rock burst—Part 6: Monitoring method of drilling bits
[15]  
ZHU Guangan, LIU Haiyang, SHEN Wei, Et al., Experimental research on burst-prone coal mass of drilling method under rich water condition[J], Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 41, 12, pp. 2417-2431, (2022)
[16]  
PAN Yishan, XU Lianman, Experimental investigation on temperature of drilling cuttings to predict rock burst[J], Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 34, 12, pp. 2228-2232, (2012)
[17]  
LI Zhonghua, ZHU Liyuan, XU Lianman, Et al., Experimental study on using drillings temperature to test coal bed stress[J], The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 23, 3, (2012)
[18]  
ZHU Liyuan, LI Zhonghua, XU Lianman, Measuring stress and strength of coal by drilling cutting torque method on Torque of Drill Rod[J], Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 36, 11, (2014)
[19]  
XU Lianman, LI Qi, PAN Yishan, Et al., Study on forecasting rockburst of the drill pipe torque method[J], Engineering Mechanics, 31, 11, (2014)
[20]  
LI Zhonghua, ZHU Liyuan, LI Guozhen, Et al., Experimental and theoretical study of determination of coal rock strength using the drill rod torque method[J], Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 44, 4, pp. 612-616, (2015)