Automatic measurement method of drilling-cuttings of boreholes in the coal seam and test study

被引：0
作者：
Yin Y. [1 ]
Zheng W. [1 ]
Zhao T. [1 ]
Ren W. [2 ]
Zhang W. [3 ]
Zhao Z. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao
[2] Shandong Energy Group Luxi Mining Co., Ltd., Heze
[3] Shandong Tangkou Coal Co., Ltd., Jining
来源：
Meitan Kexue Jishu/Coal Science and Technology (Peking) | 2023年 / 51卷 / 11期
关键词：
coal bump; drilling-cuttings method; large-diameter borehole; measurement method; quality of drilling-cuttings;
D O I：
10.12438/cst.2022-2006
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Drilling-cutting method is a commonly used coal bump risk detection method in coal seams. The efficient and accurate acquisition of the quality of drilling-cuttings is a technical difficulty in engineering site, which could directly affect the risk detection efficiency and results. Based on the discharging characteristics of drilling-cuttings and the principle of fluid quality weighing, an automatic measuring device for drilling-cuttings suitable for different diameter boreholes is developed. This device consists of cuttings collecting unit, weighing unit, data processing system and fixing unit. It can measure the quality of the drilling-cuttings according to the flow-quality of drilling-cuttings discharged from the borehole and the calibration function. The measurement accuracy of this method is verified by laboratory test and field test. Research shows that the drilling process and drilling pipe installation process can be easily identified based on the drilling cuttings’ flow quality – time curve. The accumulated flow-quality of drilling-cuttings per meter has positive linear correlation with its actual quality, and the calibration function is related to the device measurement parameters, such as the dip angel of the weighing slideway and the sampling frequency. Compared with the conventional weighing method, when measuring the drilling-cuttings by using the automatic measurement device, the maximum measurement error of the laboratory test is less than 6.5%, and the average error of the field test is 5.13%, while the data with error less than 10% account for 86.91%. The device measure parameters and the engineering factors, such as drilling-cuttings flow velocity and particle size, have little effect on the measurement accuracy. In the construction of conventional-diameter drilling-cutting borehole, the drilling pipe installation process time is reduced by 25.16%, and the construction efficiency is increased by 11.84%. The distribution law of drilling-cuttings in the shallow part of the large-diameter destressing borehole is consistent with that of the conventional-diameter drilling-cutting borehole, and the distribution of drilling-cuttings in deeper roadway side can be obtained. The proposed automatic measurement method of drilling-cuttings can improve the construction operability of large-diameter drilling-cutting method, and can realize the synchronous operation of pressure relief and drilling-cuttings measurement. © 2023 Coal Science and Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：23 / 32
页数：9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] JIANG Yaodong, PAN Yishan, JIANG Fuxing, Et al., State of the art review on mechanism and prevention of coal bumps in China[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 39, 2, (2014)
  • [2] TAN Yunliang, GUO Weiyao, ZHAO Tongbin, Et al., Coal rib burst mechanism in deep roadway and “stress relief-support reinforcement” synergetic control and prevention[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 45, 1, pp. 66-81, (2020)
  • [3] ZHANG Junwen, SONG Zhixiang, LIU Jinliang, Et al., Architecture of structural regulation technology for rock burst disaster in deep mining of coal mine[J], Coal Science and Technology, 50, 2, pp. 27-36, (2022)
  • [4] DOU Linming, TIAN Xinyuan, CAO Anye, Et al., Present situation and problems of coal mine rock bust prevention and control in China[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 47, 1, pp. 152-171, (2022)
  • [5] ZHAO Tongbin, Weiyao GUO, TAN Yunliang, Et al., Case studies of rock bursts under complicated geological conditions during multi-seam mining at depth of 800 m[J], Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 51, 5, pp. 1539-1564, (2018)
  • [6] ZHAO Tongbin, YIN Yanchun, TAN Yunliang, Et al., Development of a rock testing system with changeable stiffness and its application in the study on the rock failure mechanical behavior[J], Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 41, 9, pp. 1846-1857, (2022)
  • [7] Yanchun YIN, ZHENG Wuwei, Xingxue TANG, Et al., Test study on failure and energy supply characteristics of rock under different loading stiffness[J], Engineering Failure Analysis, 142, (2022)
  • [8] QI Qingxin, PAN Yishan, LI Haitao, Et al., Theoretical basis and key technology of prevention and control of coal-rock dynamic disasters in deep coal mining[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 40, 5, pp. 1567-1584, (2020)
  • [9] QI Hegang, XIA Yongxue, LU Chuang, Et al., Thinking about intelligent technology of rockburst prevention and controlled mining in rockburst mine[J], Coal Science and Technology, 50, 1, pp. 151-158, (2022)
  • [10] TAN Yunliang, GUO Weiyao, XIN Hengqi, Et al., Key technology of rock burst monitoring and control in deep coal mining[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 44, 1, pp. 160-172, (2019)
123