Single- and Three-Phase Dual-Active-Bridge DC-DC Converter Comparison for Battery Electric Vehicle Powertrain Application

被引:0
作者
Guennouni, Nasr [1 ]
Machkour, Nadia [2 ]
Chebak, Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ, Green Technol Inst, Benguerir 43150, Morocco
[2] Hassan II Univ Casablanca, Ecole Natl Super Arts & Metiers, Phys Syst Lab, Complex Cyber, Casablanca 20000, Morocco
关键词
battery electric vehicles; dual-active-bridge DC-DC converter; electric powertrain; phase-shift modulation; ASYMMETRICAL DUTY-CYCLE; PHASE-SHIFT CONTROL; DC/DC CONVERTER; REACTIVE-POWER; MODULATION; SCHEME;
D O I
10.3390/en17215509
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Dual-active-bridge (DAB) DC-DC converters are of great interest for DC-DC conversion in battery electric vehicle (BEV) powertrain applications. There are two versions of DAB DC-DC converters: single-phase (1p) and three-phase (3p) architectures. Many studies have compared these architectures, selecting the 3p topology as the most efficient. However, there is a gap in the literature when comparing both architectures when single-phase-shift (SPS) modulation is not used to drive the converter. The aim of this study was to compare 1p and 3p DAB DC-DC converters driven by optimal modulation techniques appropriate for BEV powertrain applications. Mathematical loss models were derived for both architectures, and their performances were compared. A case study of a 100 kW converter was considered as an example to visualize the overall efficiency of the converter for each layout. The 1p DAB DC-DC converter architecture outperformed the 3p layout in both its Y-Y and D-D transformer configurations. The higher performance efficiency, lower number of components, and reduced design complexity make the 1p DAB DC-DC converter topology a favorable choice for BEV powertrain applications.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]   Minimum-Current-Stress Scheme of Dual Active Bridge DC-DC Converter With Unified Phase-Shift Control [J].
Hou, Nie ;
Song, Wensheng ;
Wu, Mingyi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2016, 31 (12) :8552-8561
[12]  
Hu J., 2016, P 2016 IEEE EN CONV, P1
[13]   Closed-Form Asymmetrical Duty-Cycle Control to Extend the Soft-Switching Range of Three-Phase Dual-Active-Bridge Converters [J].
Hu, Jingxin ;
Yang, Zhiqing ;
Cui, Shenghui ;
De Doncker, Rik W. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2021, 36 (08) :9609-9622
[14]  
Hu JX, 2018, INT CONF POW ELECTR, P2250, DOI 10.23919/IPEC.2018.8507672
[15]  
Hu JX, 2017, 2017 IEEE 3RD INTERNATIONAL FUTURE ENERGY ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE AND ECCE ASIA (IFEEC 2017-ECCE ASIA), P866, DOI 10.1109/IFEEC.2017.7992154
[16]   Optimized Modulation and Dynamic Control of a Three-Phase Dual Active Bridge Converter With Variable Duty Cycles [J].
Huang, Jun ;
Li, Zhuoqiang ;
Shi, Ling ;
Wang, Yue ;
Zhu, Jinda .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2019, 34 (03) :2856-2873
[17]   Unified Triple-Phase-Shift Control to Minimize Current Stress and Achieve Full Soft-Switching of Isolated Bidirectional DC-DC Converter [J].
Huang, Jun ;
Wang, Yue ;
Li, Zhuoqiang ;
Lei, Wanjun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2016, 63 (07) :4169-4179
[18]  
Huang J, 2015, APPL POWER ELECT CO, P2885, DOI 10.1109/APEC.2015.7104760
[19]  
Huang LY, 2019, INT C ELECTR MACH SY, P3320, DOI 10.1109/icems.2019.8921904
[20]  
Hurley WG, 2013, TRANSFORMERS AND INDUCTORS FOR POWER ELECTRONICS: THEORY, DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118544648