AI-driven data fusion modeling for enhanced prediction of mixed-mode I/ III fracture toughness

被引:1
作者
Timtong, Anantaya [1 ]
Ariyarit, Atthaphon [2 ]
Boongsood, Wanwanut [1 ]
Aengchuan, Prasert [1 ]
Wiangkham, Attasit [3 ]
机构
[1] Suranaree Univ Technol, Inst Engn, Sch Mfg Engn, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
[2] Suranaree Univ Technol, Inst Engn, Sch Mech Engn, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
[3] Srinakharinwirot Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Nakhon Nayok 26120, Thailand
关键词
Fracture toughness; Mixed-mode I/III; Artificial intelligence; Data fusion source model; ABSOLUTE ERROR MAE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; RMSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103289
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research evaluates the use of artificial intelligence to enhance the accuracy of predictions for mixed-mode I/ III fracture toughness in polymethyl methacrylate . Traditionally, assessing fracture toughness relies heavily on destructive testing methods, specifically using edge-notch disc bend specimens subjected to three-point bending tests. These established methods are not only expensive and time-consuming but also frequently limited by the availability of data. To address these challenges, this study introduces a data fusion source modeling approach. This approach integrates primary fracture toughness test data with secondary predictive data derived from the maximum tangential stress criterion and the local strain energy density criterion. By employing adaptive boosting and general regression neural network algorithms, the models developed in this research demonstrate a marked improvement in predictive performance compared to traditional primary source models. Additionally, a feature importance analysis using Shapley Additive exPlanations values reveals that the mode mixity parameter, specimen thickness, and radius are critical factors influencing fracture toughness. The study highlights that while mode mixity emerges as the most significant factor, a reduction in specimen thickness generally leads to decreased fracture toughness, whereas an increase in radius has a more complex, often negative, effect. The results of this study indicate that AI-powered models using data fusion can overcome limitations related to data scarcity, enabling more accurate predictions in fracture mechanics. Furthermore, this approach provides a pathway for utilizing AI in other engineering domains where data sets are limited.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
Lewis C.D, 1982, J FORECASTING
[22]  
Li XQ, 2017, APPL COMPUT ELECTROM, V32, P381
[23]   Tensile-shear transition in mixed mode I/III fracture [J].
Liu, S ;
Chao, YJ ;
Zhu, XK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2004, 41 (22-23) :6147-6172
[24]  
Moore D.R., 2001, Fracture Mechanics Testing Methods for Polymers, Adhesives and Composites
[25]  
Nelson F. G., 1972, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, V4, P33, DOI 10.1016/0013-7944(72)90075-6
[26]   Explanation of machine learning models using shapley additive explanation and application for real data in hospital [J].
Nohara, Yasunobu ;
Matsumoto, Koutarou ;
Soejima, Hidehisa ;
Nakashima, Naoki .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2022, 214
[27]  
Perez N., 2004, FRACTURE MECH
[28]   Application of generalized regression neural network optimized by fruit fly optimization algorithm for fracture toughness in a pearlitic steel [J].
Qiao, Ling ;
Liu, Yong ;
Zhu, Jingchuan .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2020, 235
[29]   Artificial Intelligence to Power the Future of Materials Science and Engineering [J].
Sha, Wuxin ;
Guo, Yaqing ;
Yuan, Qing ;
Tang, Shun ;
Zhang, Xinfang ;
Lu, Songfeng ;
Guo, Xin ;
Cao, Yuan-Cheng ;
Cheng, Shijie .
ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 2 (04)
[30]  
Shah S., 2004, Fracture Mechanics Test Methods For Concrete