FlowForensic: Flow rule enforcement for control plane attacks in software defined networking

被引:0
作者
Sampath N. [1 ]
Chinnappan J. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Information Technology and Engineering, VIT University, Vellore
[2] Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Chennai
关键词
Attacks; Mininet; POX controller; Rules; SDN; Software defined networking; Throughput;
D O I
10.1504/IJRIS.2018.096199
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to the lack of security in the traditional network, a new reprogrammable network called software defined networking has been introduced. It is a layered abstraction network with easy programmable, flexible and extensible by managing the networks by segregating the control plane from the data plane. This separation provides a way for developing more complex and advanced applications efficiently. OpenFlow is an interface between switches and controllers. It simplifies network management and programming of the network devices. The landscape of digital threats and cyber-attacks is evolving tremendously. The impact of various network attacks in software defined network environment is studied and implemented. The throughput results are compared and analysed between normal packet and spoofed packet. In accordance with the analysis of spoofed packet, rules are enforced for protection. Copyright © 2018 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 211
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A survey: Control plane scalability issues and approaches in Software-Defined Networking (SDN)
    Karakus, Murat
    Durresi, Arjan
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2017, 112 : 279 - 293
  • [22] Redundancy Control Using Software Defined Networking
    Comer, Douglas
    Karandikar, Rajas H.
    Rastegarnia, Adib
    2016 13TH IEEE ANNUAL CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS & NETWORKING CONFERENCE (CCNC), 2016,
  • [23] Review on Detection Techniques against DDoS Attacks on a Software-Defined Networking Controller
    Zubaydi, Haider Dhia
    Anbar, Mohammed
    Wey, Chong Yung
    2017 PALESTINIAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (PICICT), 2017, : 10 - 16
  • [24] Misreporting Attacks Against Load Balancers in Software-Defined Networking
    Burke, Quinn
    McDaniel, Patrick
    La Porta, Thomas
    Yu, Mingli
    He, Ting
    MOBILE NETWORKS & APPLICATIONS, 2023, 28 (04) : 1482 - 1497
  • [25] Detection and mitigation of few control plane attacks in software defined network environments using deep learning algorithm
    Kumar, M. Anand
    Onyema, Edeh Michael
    Sundaravadivazhagan, B.
    Gupta, Manish
    Shankar, Achyut
    Gude, Venkataramaiah
    Yamsani, Nagendar
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2024, 36 (26)
  • [26] Quality of Service Improvement with Optimal Software-Defined Networking Controller and Control Plane Clustering
    Ali, Jehad
    Roh, Byeong-hee
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2021, 67 (01): : 849 - 875
  • [27] Evaluation of Software-Defined Networking Control Plane Performance in Deployed Military Communications Systems
    Spencer, Jon
    Taylor, Russell
    Hancock, Robert
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICMCIS), 2017,
  • [28] A Software-Defined Networking approach for congestion control in Opportunistic Networking
    de Toro, Ma Carmen
    Borrego, Carlos
    2020 34TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKING (ICOIN 2020), 2020, : 354 - 359
  • [29] Networking Control Education by the use of Software Defined Networking Tools and Techniques
    Benavices, C.
    Garcia, I.
    Alaiz, H.
    Alonso, A.
    Alija, J. M.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (29): : 307 - 312
  • [30] SDPA: Toward a Stateful Data Plane in Software-Defined Networking
    Sun, Chen
    Bi, Jun
    Chen, Haoxian
    Hu, Hongxin
    Zheng, Zhilong
    Zhu, Shuyong
    Wu, Chenghui
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2017, 25 (06) : 3294 - 3308