Ontology alignment using artificial neural network for large-scale ontologies

被引:0
作者
Djeddi, Warith Eddine [1 ]
Khadir, Mohamed Tarek [1 ]
机构
[1] Laboratoire sur la Gestion Electronique de Document (LabGED), Computer Science Department, University of Badji Mokhtar, 23000 Annaba
关键词
Ann; Artificial neural network; Context measures; Cross-validation; Learning; Ontology alignment; Overfitting; Wordnet;
D O I
10.1504/IJMSO.2013.054180
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Achieving high match accuracy for a large variety of ontologies, considering a single matcher is often not sufficient for high match quality. Therefore, combining the corresponding weights for different semantic aspects, reflecting their different importance (or contributions) becomes unavoidable for ontology matching. Combining multiple measures into a single similarity metric has been traditionally solved using weights determined manually by an expert, or calculated through general methods (e.g. average or sigmoid function), however this does not provide a flexible and self-configuring matching tool. In this paper, an intelligent combination using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) as a machine learning-based method to ascertain how to combine multiple similarity measures into a single aggregated metric with the final aim of improving the ontology alignment quality is proposed. XMap++ is applied to benchmark and anatomy tests at OAEI campaign 2012. Results show that neural network boosts the performance in most cases, and that the proposed novel approach is competitive with top-ranked system. Copyright © 2013 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 92
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Aikins J., Brooks R., Clancey W., Natural language processing systems, The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 283-321, (1981)
[2]  
Algergawy A., Schallehn E., Saake G., Improving XML schema matching performance using Prüfer sequences, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 68, 8, pp. 728-747, (2009)
[3]  
Avesani P., Giunchiglia F., Yatskevich M., A Large Scale Taxonomy Mapping Evaluation', Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Web (ICSW), 3729, pp. 67-81, (2005)
[4]  
Bellahsene Z., Bonifati A., Rahm E., Schema Matching and Mapping, (2011)
[5]  
Bernstein P., Madhavan J., Rahm E., Generic schema matching, ten years later, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 4, 11, pp. 695-701, (2011)
[6]  
Bodenreider O., Hayamizu T., Ringwald M., De Coronado S., Zhang S., Of mice and men: Aligning mouse and human anatomies, Proceedings of American Medical Informatics Association (AIMA) Annual Symposium, pp. 61-65, (2005)
[7]  
Castano S., Antonellis V.D., Fugini M.G., Pernici B., Conceptual schema analysis: Techniques and applications, Journal ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 23, 3, pp. 286-332, (1998)
[8]  
Chalmers M., A historical view of context, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13, 3, pp. 223-247, (2004)
[9]  
Chortaras A., Stamouet G., Safylopatis A., Learning ontology alignments using recursive neural networks, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on ANN: Formal Models and Their Applications, pp. 811-816, (2005)
[10]  
Cruz I.F., Antonelli F.P., Stroe C., AgreementMaker: Efficient matching for large real-world schemas and ontologies, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2, 2, pp. 1586-1589, (2009)