Earthquake Risk Assessment of Bridge Based on Failure Probability Method

被引:0
作者
Han X. [1 ]
Cui S. [1 ]
Cui E. [1 ]
Su J. [1 ]
Zhu B. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
来源
Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University | 2018年 / 53卷 / 04期
关键词
Bridge engineering; Continuous beam bridge; Earthquake risk assessment; Failure probability method; Strip method;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.005
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To study the possibility of destruction of a high-speed railway continuous girder bridge under the influence of seismic damage, a seismic risk assessment of the bridge was conducted. The failure probability method was used, in which seismic risk is defined as the product of seismic hazard and fragility (i.e., seismic risk=seismic hazard×fragility). The bridge seismic demand model was established using the strip coating method. The bridge seismic fragility curve was obtained based on the reliability function, and the probability density function of the bridge fragility was fitted. According to seismic risk data of the bridge site, the probability density function of seismic acceleration of the bridge site was derived. The probability density function of seismic acceleration was numerically integrated with that of the bridge structural vulnerability to accomplish the probability evaluation of the bridge earthquake risk. Taking a (32+48+32) m high-speed railway continuous girder bridge as an example, the system conducted the bridge risk assessment using the failure probability method. The results show that when earthquake risk data are lacking or insufficient, it is possible to deduce and improve seismic risk analysis data using the conversion relation between the earthquake intensity distribution function and the seismic peak acceleration. For the high-speed railway (32+48+32) m continuous girder bridge, within 100 years of use, the occurrence probability of slight damage is 5.16% and that of secondary damage is 4.46%. The probabilities of slight damage and secondary damage risk of the bridge are similar, whereas the probabilities of serious damage and complete destruction are very small, indicating that serious damage and complete destruction are almost impossible. © 2018, Editorial Department of Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 703
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Cornell C.A., Risk-based structural design, Proceedings of Symposium on Risk Analysis, pp. 37-48, (1994)
  • [2] Lupoi A., Franchin P., Schotanus M., Seismic risk evaluation of RC bridge structure, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32, 8, pp. 1275-1290, (2003)
  • [3] Bradley B.A., Dhakal R.P., Error estimation of closed-form solution for annual rate of structural collapse, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 5, pp. 1721-1737, (2008)
  • [4] Kameshwar S., Padgett J.E., Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards, Engineering Structures, 78, pp. 154-166, (2014)
  • [5] (2012)
  • [6] pp. 1-10, (2008)
  • [7] Feng Q., Yuan W., Method and application of seismic risk probability analysisfor large-long span bridge based on IDA-MC, Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 30, 3, pp. 60-64, (2010)
  • [8] pp. 1-10, (2010)
  • [9] (2006)
  • [10] Han X., Li X., Xiang B., Et al., Analysis of seismic fragility of high speed railway continuous beam bridge based on IDA method, Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 33, 2, pp. 55-59, (2016)