A review of machine learning in additive manufacturing: design and process

被引:6
作者
Chen, Kefan [1 ]
Zhang, Peilei [2 ]
Yan, Hua [2 ]
Chen, Guanglong [1 ]
Sun, Tianzhu [3 ]
Lu, Qinghua [2 ]
Chen, Yu [4 ]
Shi, Haichuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Engn Sci, Sch Math Phys & Stat, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Engn Sci, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Mfg Grp WMG, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
[4] Amplitude Shanghai Laser Technol Co Ltd, Shanghai 200127, Peoples R China
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Machine learning; Deep learning; Process phase; Physics; PROCESS PARAMETERS; POROSITY PREDICTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; FDM PROCESS; OPTIMIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; MODEL; WIRE;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-024-14543-2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM), owing to its unique manufacturing approach, can drive manufacturing towards higher levels of sophistication, flexibility, and intelligence within the context of Industry 4.0. However, the complexity of AM systems and their nature as data-intensive manufacturing domains present challenges in producing high-quality products. With the advancement of digital and computer technologies, data-driven machine learning (ML) has been widely applied in AM, as it provides effective methods for quality control, process optimization, and complex system modeling. This paper succinctly summarizes the various phases of utilizing ML to assist in AM processes. It elucidates the advantages of using ML over traditional methods in each phase, starting from the pre-processing phase of design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) and parameter optimization, through the processing phase of defect detection, to the post-processing phase of part quality assessment. The objective of DfAM is to optimize product design, taking into account the interactions between multiple variables. The nonlinear capability of ML can be effectively utilized in DfAM. Defect detection aims to ensure the repeatability, durability, and reliability of parts. Combining sensors with ML can guarantee part quality. Lastly, assessing part quality and inspecting various subsystems of AM are conducted from the perspective of the part's microstructure. This review explores the application of ML in addressing numerous issues related to the AM process workflow. It provides a comprehensive and systematic summary of the application of various ML models at different phases, investigates the potential of newer ML technologies to assist AM in the future, and concludes with the limitations of current ML applications in AM as well as future development directions. By intersecting these two dynamic fields, it aims to enrich the AM research domain.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1087
页数:37
相关论文
共 175 条
[1]   The use of machine learning in process-structure-property modeling for material extrusion additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review [J].
Abdelhamid, Ziadia ;
Mohamed, Habibi ;
Kelouwani, Sousso .
JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 46 (02)
[2]   Machine learning-based identification of interpretable process-structure linkages in metal additive manufacturing [J].
Ackermann, Marc ;
Haase, Christian .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 71
[3]   MeltpoolNet: Melt pool characteristic prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing using machine learning [J].
Akbari, Parand ;
Ogoke, Francis ;
Kao, Ning-Yu ;
Meidani, Kazem ;
Yeh, Chun-Yu ;
Lee, William ;
Farimani, Amir Barati .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 55
[4]   Image Data-Based Surface Texture Characterization and Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches for Additive Manufacturing [J].
Akhil, V. ;
Raghav, G. ;
Arunachalam, N. ;
Srinivas, D. S. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 20 (02)
[5]   Additive manufacturing potential for medical devices and technology [J].
Ali, Mohammad Azam ;
Rajabi, Mina ;
Sali, Sonali Sudhir .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 28 :127-133
[6]   A market assessment of additive manufacturing potential for the aerospace industry [J].
Altiparmak, Sadettin Cem ;
Xiao, Bowen .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2021, 68 :728-738
[7]   Keyhole Porosity Identification and Localization via X-Ray Imaging With YOLO [J].
Ansari, Muhammad Ayub ;
Crampton, Andrew ;
Parkinson, Simon .
IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 :61049-61061
[8]   Influence of scan strategy and process parameters on microstructure and its optimization in additively manufactured nickel alloy 625 via laser powder bed fusion [J].
Arisoy, Yigit M. ;
Criales, Luis E. ;
Ozel, Tugrul ;
Lane, Brandon ;
Moylan, Shawn ;
Donmez, Alkan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 90 (5-8) :1393-1417
[9]   Fault Diagnosis in the Field of Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) Using Bayesian Networks [J].
Bacha, Abdelkabir ;
Sabry, Ahmed Haroun ;
Benhra, Jamal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONLINE AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 15 (03) :110-123
[10]   Assessing the capabilities of ChatGPT to improve additive manufacturing troubleshooting [J].
Badini, Silvia ;
Regondi, Stefano ;
Frontoni, Emanuele ;
Pugliese, Raffaele .
ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING POLYMER RESEARCH, 2023, 6 (03) :278-287