Price and carbon emission reduction technology competition in the electricity supply chain based on power structure

被引:0
作者
Chen, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Cui, Mengyao [1 ]
Quayson, Matthew [2 ]
Du, Heng [3 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Management Sci, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Inst Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 211167, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Power structure; carbon reduction technology; electricity supply chain; game theory; multi-agent modeling; COORDINATION; GREEN;
D O I
10.1051/ro/2024180
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study considers the research on electricity pricing and carbon reduction technology decisions of electricity supply chain enterprises under different power structures. It constructs a two-level electricity supply chain game model composed of two electricity producers and a single electricity retailer. By comparing the equilibrium solution results, the main research results are as follows: (1) in the market structure where electricity producers and electricity retailers make decisions at the same time, electricity producers are more willing to invest in low-carbon technologies and increase carbon emission reduction. The electricity retailer also set the lowest electricity prices at this time, and electricity demand is the highest. (2) In the case of the Stackelberg game for electricity producers, the wholesale electricity price is the highest, and the electricity producers obtain the most profits. In the case of the Stackelberg game for electricity retailers, the electricity price is the highest, and the profit of the electricity retailer is the highest. (3) In the market structure dominated by electricity retailers, the electricity price is the highest, and the electricity producers reduce the investment in carbon emission reduction technology after observation; the carbon emission reduction intensity is the least, and the electricity demand is also the least. (4) With the increase of price competition coefficient, the intensity of carbon emission reduction, electricity demand, electricity producers, and electricity retailer profit increase. However, as the competition coefficient of carbon reduction technology increases, these equilibrium solutions decline. We verify the above conclusions using multi-agent simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:4621 / 4650
页数:30
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Optimal Decision Guidance for the Electricity Supply Chain Integration With Renewable Energy: Aligning Smart Cities Research With Sustainable Development Goals
    Al-Nory, Malak T.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 74996 - 75006
  • [2] Chen W., 2022, Emerg. Mark. Finance Trade, P2398
  • [3] INVESTMENT STRATEGY FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ELECTRICITY SERVICE QUALITY UNDER DIFFERENT POWER STRUCTURES
    Chen, Wei
    Fan, Jianchang
    Du, Hongyan
    Zhong, Pingsi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 19 (02) : 1550 - 1572
  • [4] The Impact of Carbon Emission Quota Allocation Regulations on the Investment of Low-Carbon Technology in Electric Power Industry Under Peak-Valley Price Policy
    Chen, Wei
    Ma, Yongkai
    Bai, Chunguang
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 374 - 391
  • [5] COORDINATION STRATEGY FOR A DUAL-CHANNEL ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CHAIN WITH SUSTAINABILITY
    Chen, Wei
    Jing, Fuying
    Zhong, Li
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 18 (06) : 3879 - 3895
  • [6] ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION WITH CARBON ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT UNDER THE BENCHMARKING MECHANISM
    Chen, Wei
    Ma, Yongkai
    Hu, Weihao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 18 (02) : 713 - 730
  • [7] Dou Xun, 2012, Electric Power Automation Equipment, V32, P11
  • [8] Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation
    Drake, David F.
    Kleindorfer, Paul R.
    Van Wassenhove, Luk N.
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 25 (06) : 1006 - 1025
  • [9] Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract
    Ghosh, Debabrata
    Shah, Janat
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 164 : 319 - 329
  • [10] Fuzzy-random robust flexible programming on sustainable closed-loop renewable energy supply chain
    Giri, Binoy Krishna
    Roy, Sankar Kumar
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 363