Comparison of models for drag and non-drag forces for gas-liquid two-phase bubbly flow

被引:0
|
作者
Lote D.A. [1 ]
Vinod V. [2 ]
Patwardhan A.W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai
[2] Indira Gandhi Center of Atomic Research, Kalpakkam, 603102, Tamil Nadu
关键词
CFD simulation; Core peak; Gas void fraction; Interfacial forces; Two-phase flow; Wall peak;
D O I
10.1615/MultScienTechn.2018025983
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we have compared the effect of various interfacial forces such as drag, lift, wall lubrication and turbulent dispersion force. We analyze the contribution of these forces on numerical predictions of radial gas void fraction distribution, interfacial area concentration, and gas and liquid velocity profile. A CFD model has been developed for the prediction of radial distribution of gas void fraction and interfacial area concentration in a vertical pipe. For the development of this CFD code, the experimental data were taken from the available literature. The experimental conditions are, pipe diameter of 48.3-51.2 mm, wide range of superficial liquid velocity 0.405-2.607 m/s, and gas superficial velocity 0.0111-1.275 m/s, and wide range of bubble diameters 2.5-9.3 mm. The void fractions vary from 1.89% to 25.7%. Based on the experimental data available in the literature, three cases of low bubble Reynolds number (Reb ≈ 29), medium (Reb ≈ 880), and high (Reb ≈ 15,132), at the inlet have been selected. Different interfacial force models differ in the prediction of radial distribution of gas void fraction and interfacial area concentration. Based on the results obtained for comparison of interfacial forces, the Grace drag model, Tomiyama lift and wall lubrication model, and Burns turbulent dispersion force model were found to provide the best agreement with the experimental data. © 2018 by Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 76
页数:45
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simulation of pigging dynamics in gas-liquid two-phase flow pipelines
    Jamshidi, Behnaz
    Sarkari, Majid
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 32 : 407 - 414
  • [32] NUMERICAL MODELLING OF HOMOGENEOUS TWO-PHASE GAS-LIQUID FLOW IN A PIPE
    Yale, Ibrahim D.
    Amin, Norsarahaida
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2015, 77 (13): : 75 - 80
  • [33] Visualization study of gas-liquid two-phase flow in a hydrophobic pipe
    Kikuchi, Takayoshi
    Hazuku, Tatsuya
    Fukuhara, Yutaka
    Takamasa, Tornoji
    Hibiki, Takashi
    FEDSM 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH JOINT AMSE/JSME FLUIDS ENGINEERING SUMMER CONFERENCE VOL 1, PTS A AND B, 2007, : 479 - 485
  • [34] On the influence of gas-liquid two-phase flow on Lorentz force velocimetry
    Wiederhold, A.
    Resagk, C.
    Cierpka, C.
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 29 (08)
  • [35] Numerical Investigation of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in a Swirl Meter
    Chen, D.
    Lin, Z.
    MAPAN-JOURNAL OF METROLOGY SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2021, 36 (03): : 521 - 532
  • [36] Numerical Investigation of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in a Stirred Tank
    Ishida, Nao
    Mohammed, Al Abri
    Sekimoto, Atsushi
    Okano, Yasunori
    Abe, Shinya
    Tanaka, Kosuke
    ENGINEERING FOR SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2020, 101 : 301 - 309
  • [37] Comparison of the effect of hydrodynamic and hydrostatic models for pressure correction term in two-fluid model in gas-liquid two-phase flow modeling
    Shokri, V.
    Esmaeili, K.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2017, 237 : 334 - 346
  • [38] Interfacial wave of the gas-liquid two-phase flow in unsaturated reservoir pores
    Zhang, Guotao
    Cai, Weijie
    Tong, Baohong
    Sun, Yanhong
    Hu, Enzhu
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2023, 670
  • [39] A study of gas-liquid two-phase flow in a horizontal tube under microgravity
    Choi, B
    Fujii, T
    Asano, H
    Sugimoto, K
    MICROGRAVITY TRANSPORT PROCESSES IN FLUID, THERMAL, BIOLOGICAL, AND MATERIALS SCIENCES, 2002, 974 : 316 - 327
  • [40] Gas-liquid two-phase flow behavior in minichannels bounded with a permeable wall
    Zhang, Lifeng
    Bi, Xiaotao T.
    Wilkinson, David P.
    Anderson, Ryan
    Stumper, Juergen
    Wang, Haijiang
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2011, 66 (14) : 3377 - 3385