Comparison of models for drag and non-drag forces for gas-liquid two-phase bubbly flow

被引:0
|
作者
Lote D.A. [1 ]
Vinod V. [2 ]
Patwardhan A.W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai
[2] Indira Gandhi Center of Atomic Research, Kalpakkam, 603102, Tamil Nadu
关键词
CFD simulation; Core peak; Gas void fraction; Interfacial forces; Two-phase flow; Wall peak;
D O I
10.1615/MultScienTechn.2018025983
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we have compared the effect of various interfacial forces such as drag, lift, wall lubrication and turbulent dispersion force. We analyze the contribution of these forces on numerical predictions of radial gas void fraction distribution, interfacial area concentration, and gas and liquid velocity profile. A CFD model has been developed for the prediction of radial distribution of gas void fraction and interfacial area concentration in a vertical pipe. For the development of this CFD code, the experimental data were taken from the available literature. The experimental conditions are, pipe diameter of 48.3-51.2 mm, wide range of superficial liquid velocity 0.405-2.607 m/s, and gas superficial velocity 0.0111-1.275 m/s, and wide range of bubble diameters 2.5-9.3 mm. The void fractions vary from 1.89% to 25.7%. Based on the experimental data available in the literature, three cases of low bubble Reynolds number (Reb ≈ 29), medium (Reb ≈ 880), and high (Reb ≈ 15,132), at the inlet have been selected. Different interfacial force models differ in the prediction of radial distribution of gas void fraction and interfacial area concentration. Based on the results obtained for comparison of interfacial forces, the Grace drag model, Tomiyama lift and wall lubrication model, and Burns turbulent dispersion force model were found to provide the best agreement with the experimental data. © 2018 by Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 76
页数:45
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study on gas-liquid two-phase flow distribution inside a Flute header
    Pang, Liping
    Li, Shangmin
    Yuan, Hu
    Duan, Liqiang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 POWER CONFERENCE (POWER2020), 2020,
  • [22] On the Robustness of Two-Phase Flow Models for Bubbly Flows
    Strom, Henrik
    Zeidan, Dia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2016 (ICNAAM-2016), 2017, 1863
  • [23] A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle
    Tas-Koehler, Sibel
    Liao, Yixiang
    Hampel, Uwe
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2021, 246 (246)
  • [24] Empirical drag closure for polydisperse gas-liquid systems in bubbly flow regime: Bubble swarm and micro-scale turbulence
    Buffo, A.
    Vanni, M.
    Renze, P.
    Marchisio, D. L.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2016, 113 : 284 - 303
  • [25] Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Distribution Using Phase Separation Method
    Zhang, B. D.
    Liu, D.
    Wang, D.
    6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MULTIPHASE FLOW, HEAT MASS TRANSFER AND ENERGY CONVERSION, 2010, 1207 : 172 - 177
  • [26] Two-phase bubbly flow simulation using CFD method: A review of models for interfacial forces
    Khan, Irfan
    Wang, Mingjun
    Zhang, Yapei
    Tian, Wenxi
    Su, Guanghui
    Qiu, Suizheng
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2020, 125
  • [27] Study on Venturi nozzle for gas-liquid two-phase flow metering
    梁法春
    张修刚
    王栋
    林宗虎
    Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(New series), 2012, (01) : 107 - 110
  • [28] An existence result for the equations describing a gas-liquid two-phase flow
    Mikelic, Andro
    COMPTES RENDUS MECANIQUE, 2009, 337 (04): : 226 - 232
  • [29] Gas-liquid two-phase flow in a downward facing open channel
    Toulouse, D
    Kiss, LI
    Computational Methods in Multiphase Flow III, 2005, 50 : 219 - 228
  • [30] A new method for the flowrate measurement of gas-liquid two-phase flow
    Xie, Dailiang
    Li, Wenjun
    Wang, Fang
    Zheng, Hanguang
    Zheng, Yongjun
    Liang, Guowei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2007, 56 (04) : 1495 - 1500