Student satisfaction evaluation based on ahp-topsis method

被引:0
作者
机构
[1] School of Economy and Management, Hebei University of Science and Technology
来源
Ji, W. (jwg@vip.126.com) | 1600年 / Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., Editorial Office, P O Box 735, Olney, Bucks., MK46 5WB, MK46 5WB, United Kingdom卷 / 48期
关键词
Ahp; Index system; Student satisfaction; Topsis;
D O I
10.1504/IJCAT.2013.056922
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper aims to develop a framework that evaluates the student satisfaction. It has divided the whole framework into three stages. The first stage is to build index system to the student satisfaction. The second stage is Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to calculate weights. The third stage is Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The proposed framework can assist principals to comprehend their students' overall situation. They can identify good practices from others and can benchmark them for improving weaknesses. This framework also facilitates the decision-makers to better understand the complex relationships of student satisfaction factors in decision-making. © 2013 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 271
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Anderson E.W., Fornell C., Lehmann D.R., Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden, Journal of Marketing, 58, 3, pp. 53-66, (1994)
[2]  
Augustyn M., Ho S.K., Service quality and tourism, Journal of Travel Research, 37, 1, pp. 71-75, (1998)
[3]  
Awasthi A., Chauhan S.S., A hybrid approach integrating affinity diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36, 2, pp. 573-584, (2012)
[4]  
Awasthi A., Chauhan S.S., Goyal S.K., A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers, International Journal of Production Economics, 126, 2, pp. 370-378, (2010)
[5]  
Bodet G., Customer satisfaction and loyalty in service: Two concepts, four constructs, several relationships, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15, pp. 156-162, (2008)
[6]  
Buyukozkan G., Cifci G., A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, pp. 3000-3011, (2012)
[7]  
Cardozo R.N., An experimental study of consumer effort, expectation, and satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 3, pp. 244-249, (1965)
[8]  
Dagdeviren M., Yavuz S., Kilinc N., Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 6, pp. 870-880, (2007)
[9]  
Dyer J.S., Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, 36, 3, pp. 249-258, (1990)
[10]  
Dyer J.S., A clarification of remarks on the analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, 36, 3, pp. 274-275, (1990)