Mechanical, Adhesive and Surface Properties of a Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate CAD/CAM Ceramic Exposed to Different Etching Protocols

被引:1
|
作者
Murillo-Gomez, Fabian [1 ,2 ]
Hernandez-Viquez, Jose Roberto [1 ]
de Oca, Jose Roberto Sauma-Montes [3 ]
Vargas-Vargas, Cristina [1 ]
Gonzalez-Vargas, Natalia [1 ]
Vega-Baudrit, Jose Roberto [4 ]
Chavarria-Bolanos, Daniel [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Costa Rica UCR, Sch Dent FOd, Restorat Dent Dept, San Jose 11502, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Costa Rica UCR, Sch Dent FOd, Dent Mat Res Lab LIMD, San Jose 11502, Costa Rica
[3] Univ Costa Rica UCR, Dent Grad Program, San Jose 11502, Costa Rica
[4] Natl Ctr High Technol CENAT, Natl Lab Nanotechnol LANOTEC, San Jose, Costa Rica
关键词
zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate; CAD/CAM materials; glass-ceramics; flexural strength; surface treatment; hydrofluoric acid; HYDROFLUORIC-ACID CONCENTRATION; FATIGUE FAILURE LOAD; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; BOND STRENGTH; RESIN CEMENT; TIME; CHAIRSIDE; DISILICATE; MORPHOLOGY; ROUGHNESS;
D O I
10.3390/ma17205039
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of etching protocols on bond strength, surface roughness, and mechanical properties of a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) CAD/CAM-ceramic. In total, 100 bars (ISO 6872), 75 plaques, and 25 cubes were cut from ZLS blocks(Vita Suprinity (R)). The surfaces were standardized, crystallized and divided into five groups: 1. control (no/treatment-C), 2. 5%-Hydrofluoric-acid (HF)/20 s (HF5%20s), 3.HF5%60s, 4.HF10%20s, and 5.HF10%60s. Flexural strength (FS) (three-point bending test, 1 mm/min), roughness (Pa), and micro-shear bond-strength (mu SBS) tests were performed. The data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA, Tukey's test (p < 0.05) and Weibull (FS data). C showed higher Pa (1.176 +/- 0.370 <mu>m) than HF10%60s (0.627 +/- 0.236 mu m) and all other groups. Groups C and 20 s showed the most irregular surface patterns. The FS results were not influenced by etching protocols, while the Weibull modulus was, with the 5%HF groups being the most reliable (m: 5.63/6.70), while C and HF10%60s (m: 2.78/2.73) were the least reliable. All fractures originated from surface defects on the treated side of specimens. The 5%HF groups showed higher mu SBS (20 s: 21.35 +/- 4.70 MPa; 60 s: 23.50 +/- 4.27 MPa) than the 10%HF groups (20 s: 14.51 +/- 2.47 MPa; 60 s: 16.54 +/- 3.12 MPa) and C (6.46 +/- 2.71 MPa). The most prevalent failure pattern was "mixed" for etched groups, and "adhesive" for C. Etching protocols affect the evaluated properties by roughening materials' surface and, in some cases, regularizing surface defects. The best overall outcomes were achieved when applying 5%HF.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fabrication of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic Restorations Using a Complete Digital Workflow
    Rinke, Sven
    Roediger, Matthias
    Ziebolz, Dirk
    Schmidt, Anne-Kathrin
    CASE REPORTS IN DENTISTRY, 2015, 2015
  • [22] Survival probability of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: Effect of surface condition and fatigue test load profile
    de Oliveira Dal Piva, Amanda Maria
    Mendes Tribst, Joao Paulo
    Venturini, Andressa Borin
    Anami, Lilian Costa
    Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
    Bottino, Marco Antonio
    Kleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2020, 36 (06) : 808 - 815
  • [23] Effects of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and a New Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic
    Sato, T. P.
    Anami, L. C.
    Melo, R. M.
    Valandro, L. F.
    Bottino, M. A.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 41 (03) : 284 - 292
  • [24] The Influence of Three Different Digital Cement Spacers on the Marginal Gap Adaptation of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Crowns Fabricated by CAD-CAM System
    Ben-Izhack, Gil
    Shely, Asaf
    Naishlos, Sarit
    Glikman, Ari
    Frishman, Liad
    Meirowitz, Avi
    Dolev, Eran
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (22):
  • [25] Gastric acid challenge of lithium disilicate–reinforced glass–ceramics and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass–ceramic after polishing and glazing—impact on surface properties
    Jenni Hjerppe
    Khalil Shahramian
    Emil Rosqvist
    Lippo V. J. Lassila
    Jouko Peltonen
    Timo O. Närhi
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 6865 - 6877
  • [26] Load effect on the mechanical behaviour of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramics
    Alao, Abdur-Rasheed
    Haziq, Muhammad
    CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 47 (01) : 1353 - 1363
  • [27] Interfacial fracture toughness of different surface treatments on zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics
    Tang, Tianyu
    Suputtamongkol, Kallaya
    Harnirattisai, Cholthacha
    Neoh, Siew Peng
    Pongprueksa, Pong
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2023, 42 (06) : 835 - 843
  • [28] Marginal adaptation of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate overlays with different preparation designs
    Falahchai, Mehran
    Hemmati, Yasamin Babaee
    Asli, Hamid Neshandar
    Asli, Marzieh Neshandar
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 32 (08) : 823 - 830
  • [29] Chairside Fabrication of an All-Ceramic Partial Crown Using a Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic
    Rinke, Sven
    Pabel, Anne-Kathrin
    Roediger, Matthias
    Ziebolz, Dirk
    CASE REPORTS IN DENTISTRY, 2016, 2016
  • [30] Effect of Two Different Intraoral Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Color Stability, and Bacterial Accumulation of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic
    Makkeyah, Fatma
    Moustafa, Dina Mohamed
    Bakr, Mahmoud M.
    Al Ankily, Mahmoud
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024,