How to undertake ideologically contentious research: Leaning on reflexivity and positionality to address uncomfortable disjuncture's in information research

被引：0

作者：

Oltmann S.M. ^{[1
]}

Barriage S. ^{[2
]}

Greyson D. ^{[3
]}

Vaughn M. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] School of Information Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

[2] School of Information Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA

[3] Department of Communication, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA

[4] School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN

来源：

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2020年 / 57卷 / 01期

关键词：

ideology; methods; positionality; qualitative; reflexivity;

D O I：

10.1002/pra2.282

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In this 40-minute panel, four researchers who study contentious issues will discuss those topics and address how they navigate ideological disagreements with their research participants. Reflexivity and positionality are two analytical tools that are useful in this process of unpacking research. We describe these concepts and position our own research within these spaces. 83rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science & Technology October 25-29, 2020. Author(s) retain copyright, but ASIS&T receives an exclusive publication license.

引用