Effect of continuously appling controlled-release fertilizers on nitrogen balance and utilization in winter wheat-summer maize cropping system

被引:0
作者
Wang W. [1 ]
Dong W. [1 ]
Chen S. [1 ]
Li J. [1 ]
Chen T. [1 ]
Hu C. [1 ]
机构
[1] The Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang
来源
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2016年 / 32卷
关键词
Crops; Fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency; Fertilizers; Nitrate accumulation; Nitrogen; Wheat-maize two-crop system; Yield;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.z2.018
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Currently, the research about the controlled-release fertilizer affecting crop yield and nitrogen loss is extensive, but it's lacking about the soil nitrogen balance after long-term applying controlled-release fertilizer with different managing practices. This study determined ammonia volatilization, nitrogen uptake by crop and nitrite accumulation in soil with applying controlled-release fertilizer for 3 years continuously in winter wheat/summer maize cropping system in North China Plain (NCP). There were 5 treatments: no nitrogen fertilizer (CK), conventional dosage of urea (CU), optimum dosage of urea (75% of the conventional dosage, OU), conventional and optimum dosage of controlled-release fertilizer (CC and OC), respectively. The CK treatment was chosen from a long-term experiment without nitrogen lasting for 15 years, and the CU treatment was 505 kg/(hm2·a) (nitrogen amount) based on the average of the survey at the local farmlands. The results showed that ammonia volatilization was lower after the controlled-release fertilizer was applied in the 3 periods (base fertilizer for wheat, top dressing for wheat and base fertilizer for maize) in the whole growth season in a year, due to the prevention of the hydrolysis of urea by adding the inhibitor in controlled-release fertilizer, especially in the warmer condition of base fertilizer for maize. At the end of the three-year experiments, the accumulation of nitrate in soil for the OU treatment was lower significantly than the CU treatment in the whole profile (0-180 cm); while for the OC treatment the accumulation reduced only in the deep layers (below 100 cm). There were no significant differences in the yield of wheat or maize among the 4 treatments of nitrogen applied in the first year, due to the excessive fertilization in the past years. The yield of maize for OC treatment was significantly higher than that for the OU in the second year, but for wheat both in the second and the third year. In contrast, for the CC treatment, the yield of maize only in the second year was higher than the CU treatment. As for the average yield of wheat and maize in 3 years, the OU treatment was significantly lower than other 3 treatments (OC, CC and CU treatments). The average of nitrogen apparent efficiency in 3 years was the maximum for the OC treatment, followed by the CC and the CU treatments; and the CU treatment was the minimum. This study shows that the use of controlled-release fertilizer can't increase the yield of the crop with conventional dosage applied, but can significantly improve the nitrogen apparent efficiency with reducing fertilizer input by 25%, and also can maintain the long-term soil nitrogen balance. © 2016, Editorial Department of the Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 141
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Hu C., Dong W., Zhang Y., Et al., Nitrogen flux and its manipulation in the cropland ecosystem of the North China Plain, Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 19, 5, pp. 997-1003, (2011)
[2]  
Grant C.A., Wu R., Selles F., Et al., Crop yield and nitrogen concentration with controlled release urea and split applications of nitrogen as compared to non-coated urea applied at seeding, Field Crops Research, 127, pp. 170-180, (2012)
[3]  
Zheng W., Zhang M., Liu Z., Et al., Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system, Field Crops Research, 197, pp. 52-62, (2016)
[4]  
Wang F., Zhuo D., Zhang Q., Et al., Effects of urea and resin coated urea fertilizers on NO<sub>3</sub>-N content in soil and yield of wheat, Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 47, 2, pp. 64-67, (2015)
[5]  
Zhu X., Liu Z., Jiang L., Et al., Effects of decreasing application amount of control-released fertilizer on winter wheat yield, nitrogen efficiency and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>-N in soil, Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 44, 3, pp. 63-67, (2012)
[6]  
Xie Y., Rong X., Zhang Y., Et al., Effects of reduced CRNF applications on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and ammonia volatilization in spring maize soil, 35, 3, pp. 596-603, (2016)
[7]  
Lu Y., Bai Y., Wang L., Et al., Efficiency analysis of slow/controlled release fertilizer on wheat-maize in North China, Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 17, 1, pp. 209-215, (2011)
[8]  
Li Q., Li Y., Gao Q., Et al., Effect of conventional and optimized nitrogen fertilization on spring maize yield, ammonia volatilization and nitrogen balance in soil-maize system, Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 21, 3, pp. 571-579, (2015)
[9]  
Tian G.M., Cao J.L., Cai Z.C., Et al., Ammonia volatilization from winter wheat field top-dressed with urea, Pedosphere, 4, pp. 331-336, (1998)
[10]  
Li H., Wang L., Qiu J., Nitrate loss simulated with DNDC model and control technologies in typical cropland of North China, Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 20, 4, pp. 414-421, (2012)