An Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition, Self-Organizing Map, and Linear Genetic Programming Approach for Forecasting River Streamflow

被引:27
作者
Barge, Jonathan T. [1 ]
Sharif, Hatim O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
关键词
linear genetic programming; ensemble empirical mode decomposition; streamflow forecasting; data-driven modeling; cluster analysis; self-organizing map; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; INTELLIGENCE; SIMULATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/w8060247
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study focused on employing Linear Genetic Programming (LGP), Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD), and the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) in modeling the rainfall-runoff relationship in a mid-size catchment. Models were assessed with regard to their ability to capture daily discharge at Lock and Dam 10 along the Kentucky River as well as the hybrid design of EEM-SOM-LGP to make predictions multiple time-steps ahead. Different model designs were implemented to demonstrate the improvements of hybrid designs compared to LGP as a standalone application. Additionally, LGP was utilized to gain a better understanding of the catchment in question and to assess its ability to capture different aspects of the flow hydrograph. As a standalone application, LGP was able to outperform published Artificial Neural Network (ANN) results over the same dataset, posting an average absolute relative error (AARE) of 17.118 and Nash-Sutcliff (E) of 0.937. Utilizing EEMD derived IMF runoff subcomponents for forecasting daily discharge resulted in an AARE of 14.232 and E of 0.981. Clustering the EEMD-derived input space through an SOM before LGP application returned the strongest results, posting an AARE of 10.122 and E of 0.987. Applying LGP to the distinctive low and high flow seasons demonstrated a loss in correlation for the low flow season with an under-predictive nature signified by a normalized mean biased error (NMBE) of -2.353. Separating the rising and falling trends of the hydrograph showed that the falling trends were more easily captured with an AARE of 8.511 and E of 0.968 compared to the rising trends AARE of 38.744 and E of 0.948. Utilizing the EEMD-SOM-LGP design to make predictions multiple-time-steps ahead resulted in a AARE of 43.365 and E of 0.902 for predicting streamflow three days ahead. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of utilizing EEMD and an SOM in conjunction with LGP for streamflow forecasting.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, P IEEE INT C AC SPEE
[2]   An application of artificial intelligence for rainfall-runoff modeling [J].
Aytek, Ali ;
Asce, M. ;
Alp, Murat .
JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2008, 117 (02) :145-155
[3]  
Babovic V., 2002, HYDROL RES, V5, P331
[4]  
Beven K. J., 2011, Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer
[5]   Clustering-based hybrid inundation model for forecasting flood inundation depths [J].
Chang, Li-Chiu ;
Shen, Hung-Yu ;
Wang, Yi-Fung ;
Huang, Jing-Yu ;
Lin, Yen-Tso .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 385 (1-4) :257-268
[6]   Reinforced recurrent neural networks for multi-step-ahead flood forecasts [J].
Chen, Pin-An ;
Chang, Li-Chiu ;
Chang, Fi-John .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 497 :71-79
[7]  
Currens JamesC., 2009, Model Ordinance for Development on Karst in Kentucky
[8]   Streamflow prediction using linear genetic programming in comparison with a neuro-wavelet technique [J].
Danandeh Mehr, Ali ;
Kahya, Ercan ;
Olyaie, Ehsan .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 505 :240-249
[9]  
De Vos N.J., 2005, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V2, P365, DOI [DOI 10.5194/HESSD-2-365-2005, DOI 10.5194/HESS-9-111-2005]
[10]  
Deschaine L.M., 2004, CISC VIS NETW IND GL