The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies in a constrained hydrodynamical simulation: Morphological evolution

被引:0
|
作者
Scannapieco, Cecilia [1 ]
Creasey, Peter [1 ]
Nuza, Sebastián E. [1 ]
Yepes, Gustavo [2 ]
Gottlöber, Stefan [1 ]
Steinmetz, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Scannapieco, Cecilia
[2] Creasey, Peter
[3] Nuza, Sebastián E.
[4] Yepes, Gustavo
[5] Gottlöber, Stefan
[6] Steinmetz, Matthias
来源
| 1600年 / EDP Sciences卷 / 577期
关键词
Galaxies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aims. We study the two main constituent galaxies of a constrained simulation of the Local Group as candidates for the Milky Way (MW) and Andromeda (M31). We focus on the formation of the stellar discs and its relation to the formation of the group as a rich system with two massive galaxies, and investigate the effects of mergers and accretion as drivers of morphological transformations. We also assess the effects of varying the assumed feedback model on our results by running two different simulations, a first one where only supernova feedback is included and a second where we also model radiation pressure from stars. Methods. We use a state-of-the-art hydrodynamical code which includes star formation, feedback, and chemical enrichment to carry out our study. We use our two simulations, where we include or neglect the effects of radiation pressure from stars, to investigate the impact of this process on the morphologies and star formation rates of the simulated galaxies. Results. We find that the simulated M31 and MW have different formation histories, even though both inhabit, at z = 0, the same environment. These differences directly translate into and explain variations in their star formation rates, in situ fractions, and final morphologies. The simulated M31 candidate has an active merger history, as a result of which its stellar disc is unable to survive unaffected until the present time. In contrast, the MW candidate has a smoother history with no major mergers at late times, and forms a disc that grows steadily; at z = 0 the simulated MW has an extended, rotationally-supported disc that is dominant over the bulge. Our two feedback implementations predict similar evolutions of the galaxies and their discs, although some variations are detected, the most important of which is the formation time of the discs: in the model with weaker (stronger) feedback the discs form earlier (later). In summary, by comparing the formation histories of the two simulated galaxies, we conclude that the particular merger and accretion history of a galaxy rather than its environment at the LG-scales is the main driver of the formation and subsequent growth or destruction of galaxy discs. © ESO, 2015.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies in a constrained hydrodynamical simulation: morphological evolution
    Scannapieco, Cecilia
    Creasey, Peter
    Nuza, Sebastian E.
    Yepes, Gustavo
    Gottloeber, Stefan
    Steinmetz, Matthias
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2015, 577
  • [2] The masses of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies
    Watkins, Laura L.
    Evans, N. Wyn
    An, Jin H.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 406 (01) : 264 - 278
  • [3] The haloes of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies
    Evans, NW
    Wilkinson, MI
    MICROLENSING 2000: A NEW ERA OF MICROLENSING ASTROPHYSICS, 2001, 239 : 299 - 308
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF THE ANDROMEDA AND MILKY-WAY GALAXIES
    HODGE, P
    IAU SYMPOSIA, 1985, (106): : 423 - 430
  • [5] Satellite galaxies in hydrodynamical simulations of Milky Way sized galaxies
    Wadepuhl, Markus
    Springel, Volker
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 410 (03) : 1975 - 1992
  • [6] The spatial distribution of the Milky Way and Andromeda satellite galaxies
    Metz, Manuel
    Kroupa, Pavel
    Jerjen, Helmut
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 374 (03) : 1125 - 1145
  • [7] Weighing the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies with artificial intelligence
    Villanueva-Domingo, Pablo
    Villaescusa-Navarro, Francisco
    Genel, Shy
    Angles-Alcazar, Daniel
    Hernquist, Lars
    Marinacci, Federico
    Spergel, David N.
    Vogelsberger, Mark
    Narayanan, Desika
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 107 (10)
  • [8] Contrasting the chemical evolution of the Milky Way and Andromeda
    Renda, A
    Kawata, D
    Fenner, Y
    Gibson, BK
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 356 (03) : 1071 - 1078
  • [9] Are the Milky Way and Andromeda unusual? A comparison with Milky Way and Andromeda analogues
    Boardman, N.
    Zasowski, G.
    Newman, J. A.
    Andrews, B.
    Fielder, C.
    Bershady, M.
    Brinkmann, J.
    Drory, N.
    Krishnarao, D.
    Lane, R. R.
    Mackereth, T.
    Masters, K.
    Stringfellow, G. S.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 498 (04) : 4943 - 4954
  • [10] The distribution of gas in the Local Group from constrained cosmological simulations: the case for Andromeda and the Milky Way galaxies
    Nuza, Sebastian E.
    Parisi, Florencia
    Scannapieco, Cecilia
    Richter, Philipp
    Gottloeber, Stefan
    Steinmetz, Matthias
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 441 (03) : 2593 - 2612