Entropy Bounds for Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Local Bell Test

被引:0
作者
Tan, Ernest Y. -Z. [1 ,2 ]
Wolf, Ramona [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Inst Quantum Comp, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Phys & Astron, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Theoret Phys, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Siegen, Nat Wissensch Tech Fak, D-57068 Siegen, Germany
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Quantum cryptography;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.120803
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
One of the main challenges in device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) is achieving the required Bell violation over long distances, as the channel losses result in low overall detection efficiencies. Recent works have explored the concept of certifying nonlocal correlations over extended distances through the use of a local Bell test. Here, an additional quantum device is placed in close proximity to one party, using short-distance correlations to verify nonlocal behavior at long distances. However, existing works have either not resolved the question of DIQKD security against active attackers in this setup, or used methods that do not yield tight bounds on the key rates. In this work, we introduce a general formulation of the key rate computation task in this setup that can be combined with recently developed methods for analyzing standard DIQKD. Using this method, we show that if the short-distance devices exhibit sufficiently high detection efficiencies, positive key rates can be achieved in the long-distance branch with lower detection efficiencies as compared to standard DIQKD setups. This highlights the potential for improved performance of DIQKD over extended distances in scenarios where short-distance correlations are leveraged to validate quantum correlations.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PhysRevLett, DOI [10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.120803, DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.133.120803]
  • [2] SIMPLE AND TIGHT DEVICE-INDEPENDENT SECURITY PROOFS
    Arnon-Friedman, Rotem
    Renner, Renato
    Vidick, Thomas
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2019, 48 (01) : 181 - 225
  • [3] No signaling and quantum key distribution
    Barrett, J
    Hardy, L
    Kent, A
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2005, 95 (01)
  • [4] Bennett C H., 1984, P IEEE INT C COMP SY, P175, DOI [10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025, DOI 10.1016/J.TCS.2014.05.025]
  • [5] Brown P, 2024, QUANTUM-AUSTRIA, V8
  • [6] A Framework for Quantum-Secure Device-Independent Randomness Expansion
    Brown, Peter J.
    Ragy, Sammy
    Colbeck, Roger
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2020, 66 (05) : 2964 - 2987
  • [7] Extending loophole-free nonlocal correlations to arbitrarily large distances
    Chaturvedi, Anubhav
    Viola, Giuseppe
    Pawlowski, Marcin
    [J]. NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [8] Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states
    Devetak, I
    Winter, A
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2005, 461 (2053): : 207 - 235
  • [9] Practical challenges in quantum key distribution
    Diamanti, Eleni
    Lo, Hoi-Kwong
    Qi, Bing
    Yuan, Zhiliang
    [J]. NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2016, 2
  • [10] BACKGROUND LEVEL AND COUNTER EFFICIENCIES REQUIRED FOR A LOOPHOLE-FREE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN EXPERIMENT
    EBERHARD, PH
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1993, 47 (02): : R747 - R750