Hybrid dwell time prediction method for bus rapid transit based on ARIMA-SVM model

被引:3
作者
Yang M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ding J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing
[2] Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Southeast University, Nanjing
[3] Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing
来源
Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition) | 2016年 / 46卷 / 03期
关键词
Bus rapid transit; Difference autoregression; Dwell time; Hybrid prediction method; Support vector machine(SVM);
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2016.03.033
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To explore a reliable dwell time prediction technology through experiments, the physical process of bus rapid transit (BRT) when it stays at the stops is analyzed. Both the longitudinal correlation and nonlinear effects from other traffic subsystems are included in this process. Therefore, the dwell time can be divided into the linear and nonlinear parts. Accordingly, autoregressive integrated moving average(ARIMA)model and support vector machine (SVM)are adopted to predict these two parts, and the final prediction results are produced by combining the two parts. Thus, the hybrid dwell time prediction method for BRT is established. The dwell time and the relative data gained at two stops in BRT Line 2 in Changzhou are modeled. The results indicate that the hybrid prediction method is effective. Compared with the single ARIMA and SVM models, the hybrid prediction method has a sharp decline of the mean absolute error (MAPE) and the mean square error (MSE). Also, the target percent whose prediction error is less than 1 s significantly increases. Furthermore, the MAPE, MSE and the target percent can reach 0.62%, 4.05 s2 and 96.79%, respectively, when training data is enough. © 2016, Editorial Department of Journal of Southeast University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 656
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Yang Z., Wang W., Chen S., Et al., Setting methods of bus exclusive phase in bus green-wave control of urban arterial, Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 44, 4, pp. 854-858, (2014)
[2]  
Li J., Wang W., Van Zuylen H.J., Et al., Predictive strategy for transit signal priority at fixed-time signalized intersections, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2311, pp. 124-131, (2012)
[3]  
Ma W.J., Yang X.G., Efficiency analysis of transit signal priority strategies on isolated intersection, Journal of System Simulation, 20, 12, pp. 3309-3313, (2008)
[4]  
He Q., Head K.L., Ding J., PAMSCOD: Platoon-based arterial multi-modal signal control with online data, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 20, 1, pp. 164-184, (2012)
[5]  
Kim W., Rilett L.R., Improved transit signal priority system for networks with nearside bus stops, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1925, pp. 205-214, (2005)
[6]  
Dai G.Y., Wang H., Wang W., Signal optimization and coordination for bus progression based on MAXBAND, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20, 2, pp. 890-898, (2015)
[7]  
Yang M., Sun G., Wang W., Et al., Evaluation of the pre-detective signal priority for bus rapid transit: Coordinating the primary and secondary intersections, Transport, (2015)
[8]  
Li J., Zhu Z., Liu L., Et al., Multi-step Kalman filtering travel time estimation method based on simplified road network model, System Engneering-Theory & Practice, 33, 5, pp. 1289-1297, (2013)
[9]  
Kisgyorgy L., Rilett L.R., Travel time prediction by advanced neural network, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 46, 1, pp. 15-32, (2002)
[10]  
Shalaby A., Farhan A., Bus travel time prediction model for dynamic operations control and passenger information systems, TRB 82nd Annual Meeting, (2003)