Are scientific data repositories coping with research data publishing?

被引:0
|
作者
Assante M. [1 ]
Candela L. [1 ]
Castelli D. [1 ]
Tani A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione 'Alessandro Faedo', Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via G. Moruzzi 1, Pisa
来源
Candela, Leonardo (leonardo.candela@isti.cnr.it) | 1600年 / Committee on Data for Science and Technology卷 / 15期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Data infrastructures; Data Quality; Research Data Publishing; Scientific Data Repositories;
D O I
10.5334/dsj-2016-006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research data publishing is intended as the release of research data to make it possible for practitioners to (re)use them according to "open science" dynamics. There are three main actors called to deal with research data publishing practices: researchers, publishers, and data repositories. This study analyses the solutions offered by generalist scientific data repositories, i.e., repositories supporting the deposition of any type of research data. These repositories cannot make any assumption on the application domain. They are actually called to face with the almost open ended typologies of data used in science. The current practices promoted by such repositories are analysed with respect to eight key aspects of data publishing, i.e., dataset formatting, documentation, licensing, publication costs, validation, availability, discovery and access, and citation. From this analysis it emerges that these repositories implement well consolidated practices and pragmatic solutions for literature repositories. These practices and solutions can not totally meet the needs of management and use of datasets resources, especially in a context where rapid technological changes continuously open new exploitation prospects. © 2016 by the authors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An examination of scientific data repositories, data reusability, and the incorporation of FAIR
    Murillo A.P.
    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2020, 57 (01)
  • [2] Research Networks in Data Repositories
    Costa, Mark R.
    Qin, Jian
    Wang, Jun
    2014 IEEE/ACM JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES (JCDL), 2014, : 403 - 406
  • [3] Understanding Research Data Repositories as Infrastructures
    Boyd C.
    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2021, 58 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [4] Developing a data quality assurance ontology for research data repositories
    Lee, Dong Joon
    Stvilia, Besiki
    Gunaydin, Fatih
    Pang, Yuanying
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2025, 81 (07) : 63 - 84
  • [5] Data Quality Issues and Content Analysis for Research Data Repositories: The Case of Dryad
    Rousidis, Dimitris
    Garoufallou, Emmanouel
    Balatsoukas, Panos
    Sicilia, Miguel-Angel
    LET'S PUT DATA TO USE: DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP FOR THE NEXT GENERATION, 2014, : 49 - 58
  • [7] Data quality assurance in research data repositories: a theory-guided exploration and model
    Stvilia, Besiki
    Lee, Dong Joon
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2024, 80 (04) : 793 - 812
  • [8] Intrinsic and extrinsic quality of data for open data repositories
    Gonzalez-Vidal, Aurora
    Ramallo-Gonzalez, Alfonso P.
    Skarmeta, Antonio F.
    ICT EXPRESS, 2022, 8 (03): : 328 - 333
  • [9] Methods for examining data quality in healthcare integrated data repositories
    Huser, Vojtech
    Kahn, Michael G.
    Brown, Jeffrey S.
    Gouripeddi, Ramkiran
    PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2018 (PSB), 2018, : 628 - 633
  • [10] Evaluation of Metadata in Research Data Repositories: The Case of the DC.Subject Element
    Rousidis, Dimitris
    Garoufallou, Emmanouel
    Balatsoukas, Panos
    Sicilia, Miguel-Angel
    METADATA AND SEMANTICS RESEARCH, MTSR 2015, 2015, 544 : 203 - 213